Having a child and plant a tree

This proposal is not rational, but human beings are not rational. The idea is that the rulers try to become a forest of trees, to exploit our fruits.

"What outrage !" Education experts claim. "How can anyone be so opine on only we know!"

Yes, it may be true, but a few can know everything about the organization and implementation of public education, but unfortunately have not been able to prove the facts, it is almost impossible to find countries where there is conformity on that topic.

Currently (May 2014) is fashionable to think that the Scandinavian countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark) are the best examples, but perhaps not a great merit to be slightly better than the worst.

I unaccommodating in the sheaf of thugs who speak without knowing, I propose the idea that they can hear in the video, native of psychoanalysis, with that unmistakable ethnic issue delusional, irrational, poetic, incoherent... but...

In short my proposal reduces to think that humans, in the depths of our psyche, where they do not reach consciousness (the unconscious), we feel that we humans are alike Trees societies seem to forest.

If so, the political administration of popular education have logging features, in such a way that the rulers, who implement the curriculum addressed, to benefit, to perpetuate himself in power, form us as to their privileges whether large, lifelong and inheritable.

If we were in their place, any of us would do well and if we are not aware that we are selfishly exploiting fellow citizens, feel less guilt and responsibility, but in fact, as we all can see, in each of our countries have names associated with the rulers, the powerful, big business, which are repeated over several generations.

The preposterous nonsense is summarized in any educational system that generates free, smart and well developed, emotionally and intellectually citizens, because we are taught to be almost obligatory vegetables, almost motionless not to try to migrate to other socioeconomic classes, meeting in a forest for us help each other.

The good news is that the powerful designing educational plans pulp do with our bodies but only leverage our fruits.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Tener un hijo y plantar un arbol

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.202)

●●●

We just need fun

Whether it is by way of relieving ailments such as by way of increasing our pleasurable feelings, all living beings can do what we do motivated by pleasure, for fun.

This is another way to comment a deterministic point of view, contrary to the accepted view that free will.

As he said in the beginning, many dogmatic freewill relief effort will continue to read something that will never accept (determinism).

According to determinism but nobody makes decisions changes that occur in our lives are determined by many factors beyond our control.

The situation is easily understood if we do is drink water to quench a thirst that came out of our decision, but the situation is complicated if we try to understand, from determinism, why am I writing this article.

Why the title says "just need fun"?

Since all living beings fled concur pain and pleasure, it is possible to express this idea by saying this: "We seek the pleasure of running relief of pain and pleasure drawn." As seen, both the leak and the movement toward enjoyment, are similar in that we seek gratification, welfare, relief, ie 'fun'.

In short, both are by way of relieving ailments such as by way of increasing our pleasurable feelings, all living beings do what we do motivated by pleasure, for fun.

It is clear that pleasure is not the same for everyone; some fun working, striving, running, sweating, toiling, having sex, eating.

"About tastes there is nothing written", but we always try to meet our needs, desires, preferences.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Solo necesitamos diversión.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.221)

●●●

The strength of the exploited workers

If we are strong and we are weak if votes are useless.

Narcissism is the belief that others love us blind with the same passion with which we love ourselves.

It is a very sweet, tender, loving, pleasant, equivocadísima assumption. It is true that others will love us as much as we love ourselves. Moreover: the other, in the best, are indifferent; in the worst hate us, envy us jealous, wish to destroy us.

So confusing are our relationships with others with our fathers, brothers, uncles, cousins, spouses, coworkers, bosses, leaders, neighbors, acquaintances, strangers.

To earn a living have to give something in return. I mean, other than mom and dad, who are instinctively compelled to take care, all others are not worried about whether we're good, fair or poor.

Therefore, we earn our bread because we give our employer something that is useful to him.

Sometimes the socialist or communist discourse is ambivalent enough to let us believe that the capitalists or the state have to worry about our welfare. That is false: we are only protected by ourselves and others will help to the extent that our existence is profitable, beneficial, fun, worthy to be cared for them (who help us), the advantages that follow do not miss them existing.

As we see: we love us (narcissism) because we are interested in pursuing living (self-preservation) and someone else may love to the extent that also has an interest, benefit, convenience.

Workers have force provided they are useful to employers. If workers were not advantageous for employers would not have the power to pressure by threatening to stop work (strike).

In short, few greater the profits it receives our employer of our production, the greater the force that exert on him, threatening to stop production if not improve working conditions.

If we are strong and we are weak if votes are useless.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La fuerza de los trabajadores explotados.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.201)

●●●

The pain of our children

A fearful and apprehensive adult is toxic to almost everyone, especially for children. The good news is that resilience also overcomes the bad consequences of having parents who are not able to be.

A definition of resilience is: In psychology, a person's ability to overcome traumatic circumstances such as death of a loved one, an accident, etc..

It is well known that living things have some kind of defense against attackers or accidents frequently. If these mechanisms we protect us from the most frequent difficulties that we are esterándonos a probabilistic advantage as our greatest risk is concentrated precisely what we are less likely to occur.

As our psyche is prepared to exaggerate the dangers and protections to minimize the subjective perception is the inverse of the real: we believe that we run many dangers very likely threats.

In short, we have better defenses against what is likely to happen and we have worse defenses against what is very likely that we will never occur. We loved it! This situation makes us love Nature as a great friend, mother, protective.

Therefore, when we are in charge of a child care, we should not lose sight of this. If we consider not fall into the infamous neurosis. With this disease distort almost everything: what we perceive, what we assess, what we expect.

Although the video is another theme emphasizes core, in this article we rounding the idea saying neurosis is contagious because children learn from adults. If these evil assess risks exist, the child will grow up distrusting everything, thinking that the deadly quiet is not the only solution to premature death.

Moreover: the alarmists adults have low frustration tolerance and consider almost everything that makes a little bad, rebuke him excessively, harass (bullying), destabilizes emotionally.

A fearful and apprehensive adult is toxic to almost everyone, especially for children. The good news is that resilience also overcomes the bad consequences of having parents who are not able to be.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El dolor de nuestros hijos.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.220)

●●●

Culture and poverty

Our culture distorts the nature of various forms, one of which is to generate norms, prejudices, legends, which stimulate the enrichment of a few without taking pleasure most.

- The poor people are the most dan (goods, money, time).

- Those are the most stingy, greedy, selfish and petty.

These two statements are characteristic of our species. With varying degrees of conviction, are spoken by almost everyone.

This fact of life may be interpreted in at least two ways:

a) The poor are more generous and humane than the rich or, simplifying end, "the poor are good that the rich"; and

b) The poor are ignorant of their rights and therefore with high obsequiousness obey any moral standard that they do know. If a poor person is told to follow the teachings of Jesus, it is likely to do more submission than a rich man who knows his rights.

From these conclusions we could draw another: the poor are poor because they are obedient, and the rich are rich because they are disobedient.

This could also be expressed by saying: The rich are rich because they are all corrupt, amoral and criminals, while the poor are poor because they have an ethical conduct and obey the rules.

Moreover, one could argue that the poor are reliable, good citizens, good friends, good parents, while the rich are exactly the opposite.

This set of statements, beliefs, prejudices, would aggravate economic inequality often reveal economists and rulers, as is so adorable and so shameful to be poor to be rich, that to be so, not only have to work hard and break the head, but also have to row against the tide of popular sympathy.

From the affective point of view, being poor is subsidized by the company, received a strong stimulus, is encouraged by the majority, composed of the poor themselves and by those who believe that social class leaves material resources that facilitate ownership by who are and remain rich.

In short: Our culture distorts nature in several ways, one of which is to generate norms, prejudices, legends, which stimulate the enrichment of a few without taking the most pleasure.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La cultura y la pobreza.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.200)

●●●