Homosexuality of heads

Just as some men imagine violated by their bosses, they also imagine that rape their subordinates.

In another article (1) say quote:”The unconscious of some men assumed that if produced under the orders of another, this is what raping and impregnating”.

You should not rule out the possibility too that this same phenomenon occurs with the psyche of women. The workers as employees may have sexual fantasies about her boss and her boss.

Note that both sexes are so different, (in several articles [2] have even suggested that we study how we were different species), which also differ homosexualities.

Indeed, men can have anal sex with a woman so much as a man. This capability, enabled by having a penetrating genital, not women. Therefore, when a man anally penetrates, not very clear if you are doing in terms gay or straight.

Homophobia is usually interpreted as a radical heterosexuality. Those are very intolerant of those who exercise that option very manly imagine, but the unfriendly psychoanalysis denies nodding, “You are too manly rather fear him being too gay and the other we realize".

Based on these considerations, including what I mentioned in the above article (1) and how we should interpret the fascinating anal sex, now we might add that people who are running for leadership positions may have fantasies that are complementary to some subordinates.

Put another way : if some men suffer from the unconscious feeling of being violated by who makes them produce (boss, leader, foreman), who exercise, or wish to exercise these roles can also have homosexual fantasies anally penetrate workers of the same sex.

(1) La rebelión del trabajador que se siente violado

(2) ¡Qué sola estoy!

El patriarcado y la pobreza

Recibir dinero es recibir un pene

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La homosexualidad de los jefes.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.054)

●●●

The fear of pain aggression

Perhaps armies were always male because our fear of pain makes us more passion to fight them.

I was always interested to know what happens to us with pain, to the point that, from writing on the subject, I got the excuse to create a blog (1).

More recently, I was re- called by the subject, and here I am, writing about the same (2).

As it is not possible to know how others feel pain, do not know exactly about the suffering of others, we can only go by what we imagine the situation of a suffering, we put in place, try to identify with him. Only then assume how others suffer.

However, it is possible to venture a guess generalizing, just to gather the views of those willing to trust her.

This hypothesis says that men generalizing are less resistant to pain than women. Moreover add that among them are more people who feel some erotic pleasure with pain and among them are more people who feel some erotic pleasure causing pain. Specifically: a feature masochism and sadism predominantly female is a predominantly male feature.

If you believe that these assumptions can lead to some interesting conclusions, then continue together.

Why armies are composed mainly of male?

It seems logical that, while they were killed on the front lines, they were devoted to replenish new specimens without risking death under fire from enemies. However, is not as logical because soldiers replenishing this way delay that lasted more than wars.

I think the soldiers were always men because the fear of pain makes us more aggressive than them. Being more resistant, less passion women would lose combative and even wars.

(1) Blog dedicado a temas referidos al dolor: Vivir duele

(2) La hipersensibilidad masculina y la condena bíblica

...y si todos fuéramos un poco masoquistas?

Literatura, enfermedad y pobreza

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La agresividad por miedo al dolor.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.071)

●●●

The male hypersensitivity and biblical condemnation

Because men hassles interpret the natural and tormenting, all thought to work and give birth are punishments.

It is legitimate, reasonable, and perhaps also practical to use as a working hypothesis proposed in another article (1), where I commented that bothers us work because we suffer originated biblical suggestion that punishment they received when Adam and Eve ate the apple famous.

We do have to make some effort to get the necessities of life, but also the other animals have to hunt, fetch, build nests, defend themselves from predators. We all have to make some effort to live.

Furthermore, the expansion body requiring output enable new copy gestated (deliver) is uncomfortable, but not painful to the mother precisely. If it is painful is because also, in this sense, biblical suggestion suffer.

Men and women have different responses to pain. The working hypothesis proposed in the first paragraph has to do precisely with this: men have less resistance to pain than women. In other words : the same stimulus, males hurts them and disturbed.

In another aspect might think that women can enjoy feeling pain while men may enjoy causing pain. This would be one aspect of how it occurs sparsely commented complementarity between the sexes.

Machismo is a culture marked by male preferences and it appears that the other half (women ) have a say unless a trendsetter.

As men we reject both pain tolerance have tax should be minimal or nonexistent. So women need to reject the pain that could tolerate and even enjoy.

In short : because men interpret natural discomfort tormenting, all thought to work and give birth are punishments.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La hipersensibilidad masculina y la condena bíblica.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.053)

●●●

... and if we were all a little masochistic?

We ensure that only a few patients enjoy suffering. How would our whole philosophy of life if we admit otherwise?

When something is lost tend to look where it should be, which unnecessarily prolong the time of loss. If we could find him before looking where it should be.

This minimal example is useful, however, as evidence that free will does not exist as we where we want but not where our mental conditioning force us to search.

Years ago I seek (where it should be) missing issues, just to see if I can find what my fellow humans do not find, for example, real causes of economic poverty, poverty that affects thousands of years our species and that the experts loftiest fail to resolve.

Something that should not be is that humans enjoy suffering. We are convinced that we seek pleasure and pain flee.

We are so convinced that humans always fled pain when we find someone who is sexually stimulated say that suffering is masochistic, ie, someone different from the rest, an abnormal, sick.

And what would happen if we organized our thoughts on the assumption that it is so true that humans systematically shun pain?

Note that anything that has reached the status of "truth" becomes as solid and immovable as a mountain. Whatever we think will be taken into account as it is, without modification. In the end, the truth is so rigid and motionless that becomes the center around which all other concepts should turn. What if that mountain was not so rigid and motionless?

Seeing how freely people are killed in a gym I have to doubt that we avoid the pain.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): ...y si todos fuéramos un poco masoquistas?

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.070)

●●●

Sweating was never a punishment

You might think that working and sweating suffer because we millennia bewitched with what we believe was a punishment Bible.

Several articles (1) I mentioned the biblical punishment, according to which, we have to earn our bread by the sweat of his brow.

Therefore has to be annoying sweat because otherwise there would be a penalty.

We are getting used to see many men who are paid to a company to hire you machines with which sweat profusely lifting weights, running on treadmills or pedaling bikes resistant deliberately rider effort.

This habit, which users pay, doubts that sweating is embarrassing. It's time then to ask whether that punishment for eating an apple was really a painful punishment or, on the contrary, I was just stating that humans lose a supposed divine allowance for food.

I put it in another way: if human beings of that time were accustomed to receive free food, the punishment was not to have to sweat but having to pay for food. By eating an apple had to start earning money to buy bread. The punishment was the order of the free, not having to sweat.

What do the governments of the poorest left? They suspended the punishment and return to allow them to receive a subsidy, as the humans who had those offenders who ate the forbidden apple.

Of course, as rulers have not left their ranks to Almighty God do miracles generating them food from scratch, they have no choice but to steal, expropriate or take money from those that earn a living sweating.

In short, sweat was never a punishment.

(1) Por qué es preciso sudar

Víctimas de la injusticia

La prostitución parece universal

El sudor, la Ley de la Gravedad y el castigo divino

Ganarás el pan con el sudor de tus genitales

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Sudar nunca fue un castigo.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.052)

●●●

The rebellion of the worker who feels violated

The unconscious of some men assumed that if produced under the orders of another, this is what raping and impregnating.

Yesterday I published an article (1) in which, metaphorically, suggesting the relationship between those who provide ideas and execute those ideas.

In other word, and generating the comparison explicit metaphor, saying that ideologues function as stallions (stallions) to fertilize workers embodying the idea, similar to how the females begin pregnancy.

Something similar happens with those engaged in tasks of management, control, supervision, leadership, middle management : they ordain workers performing a certain task, and the male fertilizes seems to give an order to the female body to perform the gestation process.

I repeat: who gives the orders and acts as a sperm who receives acts as an egg, which when activated by the sperm-head triggers a series of events productive... but colloquially, called re-productive.

One thing we can think is that poverty affecting our species from remote time may be caused because a majority of workers unconsciously feel raped, sodomized (anal sex between men).

If these views were correct, men who need work to help the family who want to keep emotionally are faced with a dilemma (obligation to choose between two different options) : they want to make the necessary effort to make money, but do not want feel like a pregnant woman boss to (re) produce.

In other words: you want to win decent wages but not as a prostitute.

The unconscious of many workers can lead them to feel humiliated when they receive orders from a superior. Without realizing it, (unconscious means not -conscious, unknown), rebel against some feelings that lead them to feel gay.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La rebelión del trabajador que se siente violado.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.051)

●●●

Metaphor of a male pregnancy

For three days was the scandalous cover day trial which, Gratiana Dotti, sued her husband, Victor Lakeside, accusing him of stealing the idea for the business that enriched.

The woman went to the media railing against this “plagiarist, thief, abuser “and, without falling behind, Victor answered one by one the charges.

The public quickly took sides: some were in favor and some for him.

Were swollen different. She supported her feminist women and very few men, while he supported, moderately, people from different backgrounds. The news media gave more coverage to the noisiest, exalted, outrageous and just published the laconic opinions defending the employer.

Late in the afternoon, a court spokesman told the press what was the outcome of the litigation: Considering the testimony of the litigants (husband and wife), while agreeing that the idea had been to the lady and her implementation had been the responsibility of the Lord, “this court finds that the 90 % equity belongs to the employer and the remaining 10 % belongs to his wife, who brought the idea".

The news was a bombshell among the noisy crowd that supported the claim of women. Was accused of sexism to justice in general and in particular presiding judge; gender discrimination, domestic violence the husband.

When, six months later, the mood returned to normal, the judge kept his promise to be interviewed by a well-known journalist.

The interview was really short because the judge based the ruling saying Mrs. just got the idea, as the only man puts semen, but who conceived the company was the employer as a woman does when feat.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Metáfora de un embarazo masculino.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.050)

●●●