The fear of a life without medicine

As for the ancients was honorable fear God, today seems smart to fear a life without medicine.

The human body is not a machine. In any case, some very clever humans have copied workings of our body to produce similar machines.

There is a machine that is permanently transforming, regenerating tissues, microscopic fighting attackers, adapting to the environment. No machine does that.

Course in medicine and drug manufacturers will generate much profit we make maintenance (preventive medicine) as if we were a vehicle, every few miles, you need to renew lubricants, checking brakes, lights, and other mechanical routines.

Humans do not need any preventive medicine and much less maintenance.

The anatomy of living beings in general works without special help, except for a few exceptions. For example, a broken bone repairs itself better if someone confronts the two fragments well, that alone, unaided, without medication, without artificial treatments, re-welded.

This belief that we are machines that have to be met by a mechanical almost permanently is not successful for the simple reason that ARE NOT MACHINES.

The business generated around medicine has made us believe that they are indispensable partners of existence. In our culture it is believed that no medicine can not live.

The monopolistic character prevents us know what diseases we cause those chemicals we swallow every day, like ostia blessed assure us eternal life.

I'm not optimistic about this topic. I think the industry will continue intoxicating medicine for many years, so we generated a feeling that we are protected from all evil, illness or death.

As for the ancients was honorable fear God, today seems smart to fear a life without medicine.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El temor a una vida sin medicina.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.132)

●●●

Economics is a science stomach

The unemployed collaborate unwittingly, in controlling inflation.

You could say that "Indifference is profitable" if he could substantiate.

Could you say that "The need takes away bargaining power" if he could substantiate.

An example of each case:

- If you buy or not to buy a certain item gives me the same, (indifference), I will not be willing to make any effort just to have it. I will get it only if it is very cheap or if I give it away.

- If I'm desperate for some object (need) maybe willing to pay more expensive than it's worth.

For several centuries, economists have failed to reduce poverty but working with her know when they suggest that to avoid inflation needs to be unemployed workers.

How does this work?

If work is not easy to get unemployed people will drop their claims to earn lots of money because, as I said above, "The need takes away bargaining power".

Conversely, if the unemployment rate is very low, are entrepreneurs who suffer from the need for workers and, therefore, will be the entrepreneurs who suffer "The need removing them bargaining power". Since employers can not occur if not make a profit, there will be an inflationary phenomenon because the costs will be larger employers having to pay higher wages.

Indifference is equivalent to satiety and hunger equates need.

If employers offer jobs they coveted job for many unemployed will feel like kings, but if they need workers and are not those same kings will feel like beggars.

Hunger and satiety determine all the phenomena of the economy. The governing body of this science is not the brain but the stomach.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La economía es una ciencia estomacal.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.114)

●●●

Collective benefits of some individual tragedies

A complaint which destroys the reputation of someone (case “Woody Allen-rape"), we are pleased because it improves our self-image.

It's in every media (January 2014): "Woody Allen he is a rapist".

Indeed, the story was told by a foster daughter of former Great Director, Writer, Actor, Musician Jewish and American.

If we did a poll, most would be saying that the victim is telling the truth and that the ex-Great Man is actually an abject worm the worst sort.

The sound we imagine when falls lofty character is adorable, melodious, fascinating, enchanting, hypnotic.

Billions of people were glad because this journalistic fact allows us to think "Did you see why I am so inconsequential? I did not sexually abuse my children!"

Unscrupulously confess that Woody Allen films continue liking. Say what you will.

Human creations are independent of its author. Both good and bad: not a useless creation becomes wonderful because the author is worthy of love, or creating a valuable spoils because the author is unlovable.

The fall of an idol is wonderful because it allows us to improve our relative position with respect to it: gain in self-image, we diminish envy, your chances of getting depression are reduced. In this sense, without any irony, we thank allegedly raped the daughter and all media that have allowed us to obtain these gains.

Although the only thing I care about is how much should I gained with the complaint, out of curiosity, I wonder: What have been the gain of the complainant?

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Beneficios colectivos de algunas tragedias individuales.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.131)

●●●

Mysterious negligible danger alarm

Many important people are inexplicably alarmed by a possible violent confrontation between 3.750 million poor (you read that right) and 85 millionaires hyper.

To begin 2014 we had two meetings of the poor humans. One in Davos (Switzerland), organized by the World Economic Forum and one in Cuba, organized by the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC).

"Human poor" met in two different places because some have more money than others. In Switzerland we met who have more money and we met in Cuba who have less money.

We are all equally poor on life, we all become anxious, we all live slaves of something or someone and all end the same way: dying, freeing it in less than a second of what we had and what we suffered.

The book is closed and our life story is over.

According to the media who have tried alternatives profusely meeting, the concern is the growing inequality between them. If all mankind were a biological body, we would be dismembered. It is as if, for economic reasons, the imaginary body, (the species, mankind), was despanzurrándose.

Experts say that the gap between rich and poor is increasing. Humanity has a wound instead of healing every time you open it.

What is this fear that causes inequality between the vast majority of poor and the very small amount of millionaires hyper? We fear a social explosion, ie, we fear that the 3,750 million (half of the world population), poor attack the rich 85.

If such an outbreak occurred, how many milliseconds could last the extermination of these 85 people envied and hated?

I can not believe that so many journalists, government officials, technicians and intellectuals generally waste your time alarmed by a threat that seems insignificant.

Here's something else!

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Misteriosa alarma por un peligro insignificante.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.113)

●●●

The disinterest in masturbation

Masturbation is ceasing to be so attractive that now is no longer prohibited as before.

When even felt threatened species survival instinctively drank severe precautions in the administration of sexuality.

Almost always they were united efforts of political leaders, religious leaders and medicine. The involvement of the media was always present because the rules dictated by these three institutions somehow had to reach the population.

To preserve the species family formation, health policies and especially sexual behavior were based.

The phobia, almost universal, homosexuality has as its main cause sterility of these unions.

In this article I will share with you a comment on male masturbation.

Until recently, (January 2014 courses), this practice was taboo. No one confessed practice. Now we are seven billion copies, now that fear to disappear as a species have fallen, begin to emerge more relaxed feedback autoerotism.

For males masturbate was a terrible shame, presumably because, in times of crises germinal (shortage of pregnancies, low population rate), pull sperm could be considered an unforgivable act of betrayal;

For males was also an honor to be banned claiming masturbation care so valuable seed. We privábamos a pleasure but we felt important;

The social structure based on monogamous marriage is unnatural, but ended up accepting it because we had no choice. Men are not monogamous, but if we further prohibits masturbate, our sexuality is under the control of the wife, then, with particular frequency, it appealed to extort refusing to have sex if their interests were attending.

In this situation, there was no other recourse than to please the wife who actually controlled the satisfaction of male sexual desire, or, failing that, the purchase of sexual services (prostitution), for which the man had to have the economic resources sufficient.

All this, without realizing it, is changing because we have overcome the danger of extinction.

Having overcome this danger, taboos, prohibitions and prejudices of a sexual nature are disappearing. No prohibitions loses strength libido, erotic passions diminish their intensity, perversions are scarce, leaving the sexual repression of Catholic celibacy as one of the few risk groups.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El desinterés por la masturbación.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.130)

●●●

Isolation and a deserted island

If we earn our living by dealing with others, we assess if we can not communicate our situation is like being on a deserted island.

While it is true that “Smoke and Mirrors”, we have to recognize that sometimes "Silence gives consent".

Since "Not all that glitters is gold", we understand that sometimes shut someone without agreeing. Therefore, not whenever someone is dumb we interpret that agrees with the last thing you said.

However, as "The exception proves the rule" no shortage of rogues who create a situation of dumbness for appearances deceive, ie, that seems to be passing the dumb things said.

Prevent the buyer talk is a common technique in both the bad sellers and bad sellers common buyers. Good buyers are those who do not get dizzy with the verbiage seller willing to enmudecerlos.

Bad sellers are those who just want to sell, regardless of the conformity of the buyer. They forget that a business survive if your customers care for preventing waste your money.

Vendors speak-and-speak for the buyer not think, to not try to evaluate what you buy, so that it is at the mercy of the seller hypnotized-predator, are organized with a short-term strategy. They do not understand that one dissatisfied person earmark part of their energy to discredit.

The tactic of not letting the caller to speak to have the last word is not only used in trade negotiations. Out of them, many people try to keep others express : occurs between friends, between colleagues, between teachers and students, between voters and candidates, including spouses.

The other variant of this phenomenon confinement occurs when the speaker is not heard. In fact like I could not express because his ideas fail to whom they are directed.

Note that if the way we earn our living depends on communication with others, when this communication does not happen, we have to make a living like we were on a deserted island (fishing, hunting, farming, harvesting).

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La incomunicación y una isla desierta.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.112)

●●●

About inner demons and consumerism

Money is not evil. It is to prevent the inner demons that so many people work and consume less obsessively.

There are those who strive to live without money.

They believe that this conversion, this versatile merchandise, this sort of wildcard that all accept any exchange, generates a kind of curse that makes us lose the head, enslaves us, corrupts, degrades.

Many people think this and would not encourage me to say they are wrong, but nevertheless propose another explanation of why money seems diabolical.

Have you ever heard of inner demons?

They are a fantastic representation of remorse, of the sad memories, disturbing, of persecutory ideas, of merciless revenge. Also fixed ideas, concerns, incendiary jealousy, incest forbidden desires or socially condemned homosexuality. These inner demons are also the fear of insanity, to get a serious incapacitating disease or terminal ; fears of being abandoned by a loved one, to fall into economic ruin, to do something crazy (throw us out of a window, include ramming a pedestrian, killing a child).

Now back to the desire to eliminate money because it seems diabolical.

Time is money worked before. Money is work: it is nothing. Busy time in produce.

As you may have guessed, my guess is to think that the inner demons are unleashed, attack and upset when we are not amused, engaged, attentive to a task. Boredom is what enabled slavery to the evil horrors, not money.

While we are busy (making money), demons do not bother. For this reason many people do not want to take a vacation: mad fear.

Consumerism and greed are not diseases in themselves, are a resource used by those who dare to be alone with themselves. Those who live peacefully with their thoughts, they can be lazy, ascetics, hermits, austere, sober, frugal, thrifty never, never greedy or consumerist.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Sobre demonios interiores y consumismo.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.111)

●●●