What is being 'austere'

Many people feel that the opposite of "rich" is "austere", "strictly complied with the rules of morality."

Although I'm right, all my friends are left. Perhaps it is because I enjoy arguing.

They have that once a Jew Jacques Lacan asked to recommend a psychoanalyst. He did and gave the name of an Arab colleague.

I have no news if the Jew accepted the suggestion and if he did not know how it went in the analysis.

If someone asked me why I feel so much love for my ideological adversaries would have to tell myself that occurs in sexual: I get along better with women than with men. Son tastes!

Since 1 March 2005, José Mujica is the president of the Uruguayan and attract as much attention for the first time in our short history as a country we tend to be on the world press that sponsored the legalization of abortion, because it sent a bill to parliament to legalize marijuana use and because it was called as the "President of the world's poorest."

As someone who intuitively handles the media well, journalists will spend many minutes per day to cover news involving him.

Looking at the dwelling occupied with his wife Manuela Lucia and her dog, we can state that does not enjoy life or citizen, or of bourgeois life, or the First World comfort, but he says he is not poor but austere.

The word "austerity" (1) refers concepts such as suffering, pain, remorse, anguish. It is associated with sacrificed control of passions, pleasures.

In the current cultural, worthy of love a president "austere", "strictly complied with the rules of morality" (2).

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Qué es ser ‘austero’

  

(1) Definición de la palabra «austeridad» según el D.R.A.E.

(2) Definición de la palabra «austero» según el D.R.A.E.

(This is the Article No. 1763)

●●●

Why some people exaggerate

People who describe their current experiences exaggerate located from the small body they had when they were children.

In some tourist attractions include the presentation of a house where all the elements look great: doors, furniture, sanitary fixtures (toilet, bathroom).

The attraction of this exhibition is to show how the things we saw when we were small people, small children's.

When we were six years probably supposed to think with your mouth, because ideas associate it who utters the word. A couple of years after we thought maybe we could assume that his head but then ideas were the words out of his mouth.

In adulthood the situation changes, but not much. It is likely that if someone speaks or writes correctly, it evaluates intelligent (thinking either).

We might say that psychoanalysis is indebted to the children of Jean Piaget and Melanie Klein because they made many discoveries watching their own children.

The process of education is to instill adults to small all our beliefs.

Education could resemble indoctrination (political, religious, philosophical), in which the larger (and powerful), can not bear to live with people who think differently. The irritation leads to disqualify and impose our ideas.

In other words: life among adults and children contains heavy doses of intolerance because we say that small ignored when in reality what happens is that they have an explanation for almost everything, just that it's different from adults.

Moreover, it is of fun when we see the seriousness with which children present their explanations varied issues.

Returning to the big house for tourists, who also tend to exaggerate are funny because they think from the small body.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Por qué algunos adultos exageran

(This is the Article No. 1781)

●●●

The criteria mobsters less visible

Analyzed in depth and from a certain point of view, we humans relate with the environment using criteria mobsters.

One definition of the word "mafia" is:

"Group is organized to defend their interests. The theater mafia ', but the first two shows us the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (1), say:
1. f. Criminal organization of Sicilian origin.
2. f. Any clandestine criminal organization.
These references to the dictionary mentioned included the effect only from recognized definition, because the truth is that most of us have a pretty good idea of ​​what we mean by 'mafia'.

A synthesis of these concepts allow us to extract a definition to read:

Criteria mobsters are those who defend their interests be-as-is, regardless of the procedures, in which "the end justifies the means."

The business and employment shows several criteria in their marketing (dealing with customers and competitors) and his philosophy of relationships with partners (employees and suppliers).

These various criteria can be grouped into two broad categories: systems and systems negotiators mobsters.

Negotiators are those who are very aware of the legitimate interests of the counterparty (customers, employees, competitors, government and others), while the mobsters apply as much energy to destroy what opposes their interests.

As human beings are inevitably coherent (in both consistency is the foundation of health), when we have a criterion to an issue, almost certainly apply it in any other similar case.

I explain better: if philosophy of medicine is to kill all living things that harm us (insects, viruses, bacteria, poisonous plants), we are applying a criterion mobsters ... accept it even if it takes.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los criterios mafiosos menos visibles.

 

(1) Definición de la palabra «mafia» según el D.R.A.E.

(This is the Article No. 1762)

●●●

A concert is an electrical phenomenon

In public performances applaud to download an accumulation of energy (anxiety) caused by the situation.

An electric heater is an "accumulator or set of various electric accumulators" (1).

However, the full definition of the term "battery" is more extensive, means many things, but all similar.

For example, "Set artillery ready to fire," "Body of percussion instruments in a band or orchestra," "Which makes big impression on the mind."

Now I wonder why we applaud. What's that slam against the other hand, generally collectively, like a contagion similar to yawn?

Usually it is said that the applause is a way to reward who does something rewarding for applauding (speech, sight, feat).

The same dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (DRAE), says, with his unfailing sense of humor: "clap in approval or enthusiasm" (2).

While I can not deny that there is some truth in this interpretation of our passing rates or enthusiastic clapping, I would add something else to understand why we do something so out of place, it seems ridiculous not only because we are used to seeing.

My hypothesis is that a singer (for example), we produced a physical effect of electro-magnetic order. His art, his voice, orchestra, lighting effects, loaded our body as if it were a power accumulator (battery, battery).

In this phenomenon is a factor which is the buildup of joy, excitement, satisfaction, admiration, delight, many others, which reinforces the cumulative effect on our bodies.

Every so often, for example, each time a song ends, welcome to discharge excess energy (anxiety) accumulated during the singer's performance. If we feel bad aplaudiéramos.

In short: a concert is an electrical phenomenon.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Un concierto es un fenómeno eléctrico

 

(1) Definición de la palabra «batería» según el D.R.A.E.

 

(2) Definición de la palabra «aplaudir» según el D.R.A.E.

(This is the Article No. 1780)

●●●

We owned

Taking pressure, helmet and seatbelt establish who the body supposedly mine.

Psychoanalysts have to be wary, especially of our brain. It is too often that we are correcting prior knowledge that we took for successful.

All intellectuals seek the truth, but our brain insists on telling us "Here is, I found it!" ... but no, it was an illusion. Very attractive, compelling, seductive, but it was only a mirage.

Therefore, those of us who think we have to assume some kind of professional paranoia never trust to take any "evidence" as a mere possibility, but never as a hard rock on which to build a large building theoretical .

In short: do not believe most of what is written in books, or the speakers, let alone journalists and other disseminators of knowledge. They all think the same, that is: nothing. I know it is not easy to live like this, but it seems that the fate assigned me this situation and try to cope as I can.

In another article (1) I said that the obsession with medical services by taking the pressure is nothing to establish a radical asymmetry between doctor and power users (patients).

By "take a strong arm," is established "who's boss" though clearly explicit interpretation is quite another.

Something similar happens with the obligation we have drivers wear a seat belt or cyclists and motorcyclists to wear a helmet.

In all three cases, the State is concerned to make clear that this is his body and fined if I did not care (with belt and helmet).

In short: "I am me, I am the state. The commands ".

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Somos de propiedad estatal.

 

(1) La asimetría del poder médico-paciente

(This is the Article No. 1761)

●●●