The involuntary conspiracy

When we omit reporting a crime, we do because, unconsciously, we are partners and we appreciate the offender, more than we imagine.

Ordinary citizens hardly denounce the crimes committed in our presence.

It is known the sacred "code of silence" that respects death among prisoners and when I say "death" is a metaphorical expression but that the accusation usually paid with life.

For many it is difficult to guard the information they have, even with films they made cell phones, but more difficult to make the complaint.

The difficulty to respect the "code of silence" is essentially directly feeling accomplices to the crime they witnessed. Just to not to report those responsible for the legality of partnering, indirectly, illegal.

As in all cases of doubt, are held involuntarily in the mind of the witness, advantages and disadvantages to fulfill their civic duty to point out to those who break the rules.

It is clear that the lack of punishment for offenders enabled continued their illegal practices. By not making the claim that it would be, not only are " forgiving " lack, but we are checking all else that could be committed.

In other words, who do not report illegal acts, not only allows the breach of the law, but also is enabling conditions for further commission.

The situation is often complicated because doubt between reporting and non-reporting, resulting in a loss of time that is generating fault. So, who is slow to reveal what he saw, is committing a crime for obstructing the repressive actions that may apply.

The unwitting accomplice as between the prisoners, the offender recognizes that integrates its group membership, though, for shame, could never admit it.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  La involuntaria asociación para delinquir.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.034)

●●●

Anxiety and banking business

Financial companies compulsive shoppers live, of anxious, of not supporting the impatient wait.

I'll tell you a purely imagined by me, to tell a better idea, which could explain why someone has less money than you need to live on.

This fiction has as central phenomenon that some people suffer because of poverty pathological secret collusion between the bankers of a city.

These bankers are meeting every Monday in the basement of a daycare for children, because nobody would suspect a respectable gentlemen who bring their children to kindergarten, which functions as the sinister facade meeting.

After several meetings, they found a way to increase profits, as surreptitiously as they prefer.

The secret decision was to create a line of credit to finance any advertising on citizens causing a decrease in tolerance to frustration.

For example, if a trader requests a loan to finance a radio campaign that encourages listeners to not postpone the satisfactions, be granted the money you need, at very low rates, no commission and generous deadlines.

For example, if a travel agency wants to promote wonderful Mediterranean cruises, funded in easy installments, will receive a soft loan (low cost), the very long term, for, in that way, help fund these agencies travel offer their customers.

Why this immediate pleasure stimulus benefits the banking business?

For the financial system is advantageous than others, not them, excited the anxiety of the people, because most of the loans are managed because many people can not stand waiting to get the money and then spend it.

Financial firms employed live in anxiety.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  La ansiedad y el negocio bancario.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.015)

●●●

Although we are alike, no one is like another

Psychoanalysis brings a lot of energy because we can leave the task of finding, prosecuting and convicting those who think differently.

The word that I find most difficult is easy to write: "analyzability". If I could think of including it in the VIDEOcomentario that accompanies each item would have to try it several times.

But the meaning is as simple as writing: refers to the possibility that some have to participate in an analysis.

Not everyone can participate, for some people is an impossible job.

Today I met one of these cases and, thanks to him, I can make a comment.

They are unable to participate in the analysis who can not leave the conviction that all think, feel and have the same intentions as them.

Before proceeding with an analysis, almost all think so: we take as a reliable reference, we assume that everyone likes chocolate ice cream, we all hate the same politicians and that we have to educate the children of a single way possible.

People " analyzable " dulcificarán this conviction to accept sincerely believe that our way of life is as diverse as fingerprints and, with a little more therapeutic success, we accept that there are no good or bad fingerprints, but in anyway, we'll like some more than others.... As you probably accept that "about tastes there is nothing written”, we can also assume that personal tastes legislative worthless for others.

This latest effort will free us from that amount of energy we consume. I mean the prosecution, trial and punishment of those who violate our "personal laws".

This task of criticizing those who think differently is complicated because no one abides by our private law.

With these very brief descriptions can understand why psychoanalysis promises to facilitate our existence.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Aunque seamos parecidos, nadie es igual a otro.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.033)

●●●

The South Americans glorify successful theft

Liberating revolutions in Latin America are examples of successful robberies which, every so often, to honor the heroes, try to imitate.

I think for a majority of Spanish speakers would be legitimate for the owner of a farming moved to the city where he lives most of what is produced in the field he owns.

I repeat the opposite: I think for a minority of Spanish speakers would be illegitimate and reprehensible that the landlord was obliged to leave their agricultural establishment most of what he produces.

The history of America has something similar to the previous example. When the Spanish arrived in 1492, it was considered that the discovery made ​​them owners. So the Spanish Crown took over this continent and brought to Spain all she found useful, especially precious metals.

However, many of us protest fervor inflamamos Spain to demand of us back what we stole... as if the pawns of stay demanded the owner to return the production was for the city.

A South Americans teach us that we gained independence revolutionaries were heroes that we have eternally glorify Simon Bolivar, Jose de San Martin, Joaquim José da Silva Xavier, Tupac Catari José Martí, José María Morelos, Jose Gervasio Artigas, Francisco Solano López, Oscar Arnulfo Romero, Augusto César Sandino, Juan José Arévalo, Francisco Morazan, Bernardo O'Higgins, Antonio Nariño, Ely Alfaro, Tupac Amaru II, Omar Torrijos.

When I say "glorify forever”, I am also saying 'copy forever’. The best tribute is to imitate the honoree, taking as an example.

The revolutionaries are predators that, when successful, they become heroes homenajeables and imitated, and that when they fail reinforce the stability of the regime that tried to overthrow.

In short, the South Americans glorify successful theft.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los latinoamericanos glorificamos el robo exitoso.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.014)

●●●

The prohibition of doping is a game rule

The players of a sports meet standards , such as doping or bear arms in the field.

Taking advantage of the invaluable advantage that I do not know practically nothing of the profitable businesses that revolve around the most popular sporting events , ones capable of mobilizing, regularly attractive to millions of people , taking advantage of my ignorance , I repeat , I will share with you a comment it might be meritorious , especially by those who do not suffer from prejudice , which states , "He who knows, knows ."

I extend a little more in the introduction - warning to other sub -commentary might also be worthy of consideration : Who only pay attention to voices or signatures of known solvency in the subject they develop, may not know this, but in actually are religious dogmatists , ie people who do not want to take responsibility for personal decisions , that is , they prefer to blindly obey the dictates of love , because so many other people do .

So, I 'm irresponsible not be saying assure an unquestionable truth and I speak to people who themselves are responsible for analyzing the alternative ideas that come , to approve or disapprove , applying his discernment.

The anti - doping controls are a standard part of other rules of each game.

The fact that this condition is not supervised by the referee of each competition , does not prevent the intake of certain drugs is prohibited to prevent unfair competition.

In other words, some people are just good players under the effects of certain drugs , but ordinary citizens would be without this supplement .

For example , prohibiting the participation of players drunk , not because drunk is morally wrong , but because, in that game, including rules prohibiting both alcohol intake and bear arms.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La prohibición del depoje es una regla de juego más.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.032)

●●●