A fair trial is impossible

When we try to judge objectively and weighting only compare the object or person judged by our own idealized image.

Let's assume we all want to be balanced, fair, weighted, moderate, fair, even-handed, fair, reasonable, righteous, neutral, objective.

We all want to be balanced, etc., But can we? Is our nature allows us to have that feature?

My answer is no, that is: Human beings can not be balanced, etc..

What basis do I be so pessimistic? I base this on the following reasoning:

To make a judgment is necessary to evaluate the data for and against the object or person on trial.

The survival instinct that governs us distorts our ability to assess hazards and overestimates it almost ignores the non-dangerous.

In other words, when we try to weigh two data, one in favor and one against, although both weigh one gram our intellect understand how dangerous it weighs a kilo and that no dangerous weighs nothing.

We are unable to judge balance because all quantitative evaluations end altered by its qualitative features.

The poor intellect tends to assume, with excessive optimism, we can be objective, neutral, reasonable, but no, we can not.

Nature built us installing them conservation mechanisms of the individual and the species that ignore the ideas and opinions that we have. Nature is like a bullet train, where passengers can do and think what they want without thereby stopping the vehicle, change your address or do not reach the scheduled destination.

When we criticize or judge others only imagine to be objective, balanced and fair. When we try to judge objectively and weighting only compare the object or person judged by our own idealized image, not with our own real image.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Un juicio justo es imposible.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.117)

●●●

Sexual repression, and poverty doubt

Sexual repression creates doubt, which replaces the entry and exit of the penis, creating an inaction that prevents produce.

For some reason I do not know, or will know, poverty causes me pain of others. Fortunately I have enough to live decently, but I hurt material deprivation in children, women and men (in that order).

The cult of poverty preaching Christian religions seems grim, cruel, hypocritical. The promise in the past to exploit the riches few who despise the poor and gullible, seems like a big scam that exceeds our visual field so we do not see directly, but we have to infer.

In addition to the explicit and dogmatic preaching against the material well-being, (religious or not) policies that repress sexuality cause, in many people, an emotional state that prevents them from producing what they need to live on.

In other words, sexual repression breeds poverty.

The reasoning behind this assertion is not from the economy, as I mentioned, for centuries unsuccessfully fighting against poverty. Let me put forth a psychoanalytic logic reasoning, ie irrational, unconscious native.

The sexual instinct is expressed in and out of the erect genital, mouth or anus of another person penis. This other person exercises his sexual instinct in and out of an erect penis, vagina, mouth or anus.

The prohibition, repression, outlawing perform this input and output as would be natural, causes many people to perform the same movement but by the exercise of the doubt. Their minds, sexually inhibited, question: if - not now - then - I 'm staying, I do, I do.

In short, the doubt, which replaces the entry and exit of the penis, producing stun doubt, blocking the action.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Represión sexual, duda y pobreza.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.099)

●●●

Blindness to a wealth of nuances

When we admit that there are more than two sexes begin to perceive the infinite nuances of reality around us.

If I say that Roberto enjoy eating roast beef with plenty of mint oil, maybe you sketch a smile, when I say that Roberto tango dances very well, it may not make any gestures, but if you add that makes a living doing exhibitions couples dance with your brother, maybe you feel an extra heartbeat. If now will add that in his private life with his wife usually... you may suppose some evil, alien, abnormal, unhealthy mentally and morally reprehensible practices.

For several centuries we are subjected to a binary, polar, mental functioning of two elements: the good and the bad, the beautiful and the ugly, the healthy and the unhealthy.

Although it might be thought that this straightforward to intellectualize how reality is owed to René Descartes, who made ​​us believe that we are the sum of body and soul, I suggest to think that the cause is prior and more important: I mean the man duality - woman.

I admit that sounds exaggerated, but our brain tends to think that all things can be grouped into only two poles, options, categories. This drastically limiting our judgment and valuation is caused because we believe that there are only two sexes. I say more: we believe that they should only be two sexes and no more.

As humanity grows and develops 're realizing that there are various sexes. For now it is possible to speak of: man, woman, transsexual, transgender, transvestite, intersex and queer.

In addition to this particular fact, I want to emphasize the following hypothesis: if we admit the existence of various sexes would begin to perceive the vastness of nuances that have the reality around us.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Ceguera ante la nmensidad de matices.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.116)

●●●

The educational system configures future workers

The educational system of each country determines, in students, to what stimuli they respond when they become workers.

If we listen to what they say, job seekers have the impression that employers are bad people, exploiters, slave, abusive, greedy, excessively demanding, and similar adjectives.

If we listen to what they say, those seeking workers, we have the impression that these are bad people, lazy, pretentious, they want to charge a lot and do nothing, living missing without notice, to get drunk on Fridays so that even the Monday present sober, who refuse to train, they are encouraged by the unionists to lower productivity, and similar adjectives.

Correspond to abstain from taking a position because, from their point of view, they are both right and they are wrong also. What is certain is that both have different interests, but lack sufficient curiosity to find out whether or not the other party has a point.

Arguably study centers are the appropriate preamble for a given job future.

Those who study where the ruling regime is that of rewards and punishments, they will be mentally ready to perform in workplaces where the predominant regime is also the rewards and punishments.

By contrast, those who study where stimuli predominate, and penalties are a rare exception, will be mentally ready to work in workplaces where the ruling regime is also to stimulate, encourage, challenge, help, help.

In other words, the educational system determines what types of stimuli to the future workers will have a satisfactory answer.

Citizens often do not realize how they are treated as generation after generation, have received the same teaching techniques and assume that those are the only ones available. So the student - labor regime will tend to perpetuate itself.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  El sistema educativo configura a los futuros trabajadores.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.098)

●●●

Popularity, jealousy and poverty

Why, when someone needs to be 'popular', you must: celar the spouse being unfaithful and earn little money.

Most loves most. Popularity is a desired condition, valued. We would like to be members of a large family in which our brothers protect us, give us their love, help us.

Because families are often much smaller than we would like, try to enlarge building matrimonial, commercial, political, religious, professional, trade union links.

This desire forces us to match us, try not to stand out, to avoid innovation, creativity.

To be surrounded by people who love us, we can not be either competitive or individualistic, nor original, nor extravagant. We have to be like everyone else and do what others do.

This is how we ended up increasing our tranquility and decreasing profitability. If not excel, do what everyone else does, we split the usefulness of this unique activity among more people.

From here we can draw a conclusion: a lower return in popularity.

Popularity not only imposes a lower return but, to avoid envy, will point directly to perform any task that keeps us poor profitability, to the envy of others does not undermine the emotional, social, family relationship, we need to conserve.

La, just mentioned, envy is such a popular feeling as jealousy.

To feel that multitudinous family members, we must possess desires and tastes similar to others. Our desires and preferences must be common to the rest of our group.

Jealousy appears when, to feel better integrated into the great family, need to feel that others would enjoy and love our spouse. Worse still, we have this 'popular' sentiment because, if we were honest, we would recognize that it would increase our popularity also if we possessed a neighbor's wife.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Popularidad, celos y pobreza.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.097)

●●●

Every question includes its response

According to some beliefs, the whole question is associated with its corresponding answer. With some insight is possible to discover the response.

Some people say, and they may be right, that each question carries its own answer.

Arguably another way: it would be possible to ask a question if there was a chance of some response.

We could also think so: the anguish of uncertainty is composed of two parts: one visible and one invisible. Either side, as I say, are one thing which we call anxiety, uncertainty, doubt, worry.

This unique item only shows one side and the other hidden. Sample question and hides the reply.

Since, according to this belief, there is no question but your answer, we can say that in formulating the question are showing that there is a response momentarily ignored.

When we ask the question to a friend, a coach, a soothsayer, we would be making a mistake because, so I just said, the question is the known part of a distressing uncertainty and, therefore, who knows the question is the only person inside the reply.

However, anything can happen.

For those who are in contact with children and observe how expontáneos are transparent. It is hard not to notice what their intentions are. A minimally experiementado adult can anticipate what he will say a little.

As adults we are a little children, especially when something bothers us, weakens us infantilized, and as some people are more perceptive than others, it is possible to find adults who achieve interpret the gestures of someone with the same ease as any of us can anticipate what will say or do a little.

In short, if we can trust our insight, maybe we can figure out some answers on the question.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Toda pregunta incluye su respuesta.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.114)

●●●

Nomadic offices

The mobility of the service sector is allowed because the smart phones work like an office where there will work.

In our species some are nomadic and others are sedentary. Some move almost continuously, and others always live in the same place.

Humans are a particularly vulnerable species, linger many years to adult self-sustaining. but we're well compensated by a high adaptive capacity. Most species inhabit only certain areas of the planet we inhabit in almost anyone.

In Hispanic cultures have had a strong tendency to definitely settle somewhere and we also like to own land exclusively. The dream of homeownership is a widespread feature.

However, the home fijedad is giving way to a progressive nomadism and the dream of home ownership now starts to look like the option of spending a lifetime paying a mortgage.

Economists identify three economic sectors: the primary. dedicated to agricultural production. the secondary. dedicated to the industry and the tertiary, dedicated to providing services.

Both primary and secondary can be exercised only under a sedentary lifestyle. Farmers and industrial establishments possess property. However, the service sector is less dependent on a fixed location.

Gradually. agricultural entrepreneurs and industrialists are becoming less because it is a common practice merging into large multinational corporations. By contrast. the services sector works very well organized in small businesses. which comprise fewer workers. not one-person rule. in which each individual is their own business.

Workers in the service sector. thanks to the benefits of smart-mobile phones can now move his office where slopes and migrate to find work.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Las oficinas nómadas.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.096)

●●●