Making love or hate

There is the possibility that some cases of domestic violence are actually frustrated breeding attempts in which she wanted to arouse sexually harass him, never dreaming that he would be furious and destructive attack.

In another article (1), and by rational rodeo, I came to the conclusion that the unmarked male gender, our own language, could not be feminine as they claim.

To make it clear: the language indicates that a group of boys and girls, children must be said, even if they are 99 girls and one boy. Of course, they claim that the situation is the reverse, or, in any case, that gender is determined by the prevalence, that is, if 100 children, 51 were girls, then it would be right to say girls generally.

The explanation given in the article, (whose reading would suggest, just follow the link that is given at the end of this article), referred to the genus unlabeled is male for women bother, protest, claiming them men, they are sexually excited, have sex with them to appease them, and so finish brewing new specimens to ensure the conservation of the species.

Reinforced this argument by saying that if gender outside unlabeled women and those men were disturbed, the claim would not lead to reproductive sex but violent, destructive, prejudicial to the conservation of the species claims.

In fact, - and this is the focus of this article- and not always for women irritate men with their claims obtained a loving appeasement, fertilizing.

Indeed, it may happen that a man feels harassed and instead of trying to appease the woman making love in a reproductive, chooses to attack, physically or psychologically, destructive, hateful, excessively aggressive violence, seeking to kill the woman protesting because they feel unloved in a society where gender is not marked male.

In conclusion, there is a possibility that some cases of domestic violence are actually frustrated breeding attempts in which she wanted to arouse sexually harass him, never dreaming that he would be furious and destructive attack.

(1) Erotismo lingüístico

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Hacer el amor o el odio.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.168)

●●●

Thinking 0 (zero)

The pursuit of pleasure is usually healthy lure used by scammers when we promise we would like to happen: zero hunger, zero crime, zero poverty. The scam is accomplished when our capacity for discernment is operating with zero intelligence.

In political campaigns, demagogues (unscrupulous people who are willing to promise anything just to get votes that grant power), abuse the naivete of voters, deceive us like children, to tease us.

Of course they are not solely responsible for this misuse of the policy. Voters also collaborate with irresponsibility accepting promises are notoriously proselytizing (guided by the sole purpose of getting adhesions).

The phenomenon is part of religious behavior that characterizes our species. We are able to believe in the existence of a higher being (God), to which we assign and magical attributes, we satisfied with that, some you organize your life taking as true the fantasies created around this fictional character.

A psychotic delusion is an equally coercive mental functioning, which guides the conduct of the patient but, unlike the religious thought, is not shared by others. The difference between psychotic delusion and religious belief is one statistic: if many people share the same delusion (the existence of God) is not a religion but a psychotic delusion. If the same operation we found him in one person, we would say who has a delusional psychosis.

All delirium or religious magical thinking is geared to please, directly or indirectly, to the person suffering. The pleasure orientated nearly all our operations, mental and non-mental. When we feel pain, some internal process is triggered to restore painless situation (good health).

This finding is usually healthy treat lure used by scammers when we promise we would like to happen: zero hunger, zero crime, zero poverty. The scam is accomplished when our capacity for discernment is operating with zero intelligence.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Pensamiento 0 (cero).

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.150)

●●●

Erotica Language

The male is the default gender in our language is because the protest claim is erotic women, whereas if the claim out of the men would be destructive.

This article takes up, from another point of view, an issue that was already mentioned in previous text and video (1).

Here I try to share an explanation of why our Castilian language there is some male privilege, a feature which technically is called unmarked male gender.

Just as computer programs find that some options are selected by default, in our language, something similar happens with gender.

In Word, for example, the default font letter Normal, but there are also options for italics, bold, or both combined. When we do an express configuration, the program uses the letter Normal.

In our language, we can say the kids even when we are referring to an integrated group for children.

It is common for women to feel uncomfortable by this discrimination seems to disregard them. Therefore, some political demagogues well, forcing the language, to refer to a mixed group of children, say the children, with the Castilian indicates that it is correct to say the children to indicate the inclusion of both sexes.

The cause, the origin of this apparent injustice that puts the female in second place, could be the following :

To stimulate fertilization between human, positive one, diffuse, constant disagreement generic woman, that stimulates to annoy, irritate, complain to the man she has chosen to father her children. If she is upset (for example, feeling displaced linguistically) bother you, excite you sexually, he will try to calm her to stop bothering him, and, after copulation, the link back to its best condition, but with a pregnant woman to assist in the conservation of the species.

In short, the arbitrary choice as male gender unlabeled allows them sexually excite the male species and ensure its preservation. If, on the contrary, gender outside unlabeled female, the male reaction protest would not exactly erotic, but violent, destructive, annihilating the species.

(1) Las mujeres «hinchan y rompen los huevos»

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Erotismo lingüístico.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.167)

●●●

The Catholic Church is a union

The preaching poverty for the Catholic Church doing favors employers directly, as have workers whose salary expectations are more moderate.

In a capitalist society we have unions that unite the workers to negotiate more balanced with employers and unions have religious subtly paid by the employers, the workers are linked to convince them that being rich is against God's wishes.

Contemptuously, unions more militant and committed to the interests of the working class laborers called yellow unions to which clandestinely say they identify with the interests of workers but in fact do the same religions, ie reinforcing even the bargaining power of employers.

The Catholic Christian union applauds and glorifies the pain of poverty. It also tells the rich who want to earn heaven, that alms painless lacks the penitential dimension should have. Alms with what is left does not accumulate heavenly points. This pain message to the rich who could work with the poor seems rather a tip for not cooperating.

This comparison I make with yellow unions (also called vertical) is encouraged by my distrust of the real intentions of Catholic leaders and leaders of the yellow unions.

My suspicion goes so far assume that the obscene wealth that has the Catholic Church could not have formed with the alms of the poor but with donations from wealthy Pharaoh who somehow give back the help from the pulpits, receive from priests when the sermons discourage the fight for better wages.

In fact nothing has changed and this gives us the pattern that society is healthy. Wealthy businessmen, poor workers, labor unions, and religious and yellow employers unions, form a dynamic set of actors that keeps our capitalist society with reasonable health.

In short, anything have to change if everyone in one way or another, they concur. In any case this article would be a simple description of how some events occur that are not usually explicit.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La Iglesia Católica es un sindicato.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.149)

●●●

Mind consists of bone tissue

Perhaps her mind is as rigid as the skull that contains it.

In two articles published (1), I would say my hypothesis that our psyche does not accept any idea. Just to ease my explanation, I appealed to compare ideas with shoes, while some other are not easily interchangeable between different people.

We tend to imagine that everything we think, we affirm as true, it has come to our mind through a rigorous selection process fair. We believe that everything we say as valid has passed various quality checks, led by our reasoning.

Not so. Moreover, if we try to report on how we came to decide that such a religion is the best, or that such vehicle brand is excellent, or that such sports picture is the only acceptable because everyone else does not have the merits of our chosen and if we were to base those decisions, again, we could not.

I'll tell you something of our Uruguayan family.

For several years we have chosen as president of the republic to an ex-guerrilla (José Mujica), whose physical appearance, their dress, to talk, to fit, to represent all before international organizations leaves much to be desired.

Many of his opponents (Uruguayan and foreign), believe that "the truth can blend with good taste". Ie: the slovenliness of his person strongly disqualifies its management and speeches. Although the international press does not speak well for him, in the interior of our country deny the good ideas and good governance, among other reasons, because it clashes with the taste.

This story tries to show how our resistance to certain ideas is irrational, though we strive to justify the rejection pseudo reasoning and unable to recognize that our mind can not accept certain proposals, as well as being unable to leave others.

Perhaps her mind is as rigid as the skull that contains it.

(1) La mente no admite cualquier idea

La intolerancia a los zapatos

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  La mente está constituida por tejido óseo.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.166)

●●●

Fertile and infertile, neighboring land

The coexistence of natives indolent industrious immigrants may be conflicting by different attitude towards life who knows the challenges and who does not know them.

We know that the territories can be very different despite being relatively close. For example, a fertile land can be next to a mountain 100 % unproductive.

Now imagine that the mountainous area and the grassland area, belong to different peoples. Coincidentally, the border that separates leaves from one side to another infertile mountain side land suitable for any crop.

It is clear that both peoples have very different life conditions. We might anticipate that the people living on the mountain will have to be more resourceful, hardworking, disciplined, thrifty, caring and modernized than the other, you live where livelihoods can depend on out to collect fruit every time you feel hungry.

However, if these people belonged to the same country, if both geographical areas they were not separated by a border, the situation would be different. Perhaps the mountain would be uninhabited and all would gather in the fertile lands to enjoy the benefits of the land.

This set of people moved from the mountain to the valley, and not have to work as hard or be smart or disciplined, or thrifty, not caring, not tech.

There would be another important change: like all human beings are different in many features, but mainly in our feelings, desires and intentions, we are certain that the inhabitants of the valley would have all the same assets: foreign (ex-Highlanders) have more wealth the natives, they would feel uncomfortable with foreign-rich and that would lead to social conflict between poor (native) and rich (immigrants).

In the first situation, when people belonging to different jurisdictions, we had no social conflict because, in any case, would trade both peoples, have diplomatic relations, but there were no conflicts of envy. Farmers should probably import many goods from the most sophisticated mountain and this, to some extent, balance the quality of life of both peoples.

As we see, belong to the same people, the same family integration, creates conflicts, whereas the separation increases the chances of better relations within each village, good trade relations between the two groups, and a decrease in conflicts caused by inequalities in the distribution of wealth.

According to this hypothesis, the most fertile area would be exposed to less fertile area social problems. Jealousy, envy, the more time and energy available that allow a territory that is not present great challenges, are contributing factors alone, explosives discomforts.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Tierras fértiles e infértiles, vecinas.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.148)

●●●

Intolerance shoes

I try to explain why, for over the years, very little changed our physical appearance and our ideological aspect.

This paper proposes video and think that ideas, ways of thinking, philosophies of life, beliefs, preferences, harmoniously integrated to the body.

As we form a complete, coherent, functional whole, we have freely interchangeable parts. Perhaps this our immune system is also responsible when viewed attacking microorganisms colonize or when trying rejects a foreign tissue graft.

Note that this fantastic device (the immune system) has the ability to discriminate between foreign and incompatible tissues and cells but also strange that reach the woman's body to impregnate her. This army combat pathogenic microorganisms, but allows the entry of sperm of a similar size.

For some reason we lose patience with those who have different beliefs from ours, but we ignore the anatomical differences that distinguish us. We can get along with people of another race, another tall, another culture, but difficult to understand with people with other political ideas, other faiths, other philosophy of life.

What I'm trying to propose is that since stepped forward elsewhere (1), can not think what we want because our psyche to accept or not accept certain ideas. We can never accept an idea that is not compatible with the rest of our ideas, of our anatomy and our physiology, but Western culture is satisfied that the ideas are not related to the anatomical.

For more than five centuries believe in Cartesian dualism, that is, that are sort of a sum of two distinct and separate elements: a physical part and a thinking part.

This explains why, for over the years, very little changed our physical appearance and our ideological aspect.

(1) La mente no admite cualquier idea

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Intolerancia a los zapatos.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.165)

●●●