Formal University and University of Life

Formal University has something valuable: develops in students a personal discipline that the University of Life hardly achieved.

Some people are proud of having studied at University Street, also called University of Life.

I was fortunate to have studied in the two and I feel with some authority to say that both have good and bad features.

In fact I would say that neither is better than the other, because as I said, neither gives us all the knowledge needed to get rid of the problems we have living things: fear, uncertainty, inexperience, bad data , we believe, to assume that non-graduates from universities are one of those people less valuable than graduates think that they'll come looking for us work, imagine that our salary is necessarily better than the other non-graduates, and endless inefficiencies that become ineffective our labor management, in order to get the financial resources we need to found a family and settle.

Like most workers is a graduate of the University of the Street (or Life), I will comment some of the other university, the scholars, which imposes certain formalities to achieve some degree.

- There is prejudice among potential employers University Street is sloppy, undisciplined, unpredictable, inconsistent, incomplete, unreliable;

- We must recognize that the prejudices of employers affect job seekers, so the University of Life is more suitable for young people who prefer to do without working for others and prefer to work for themselves;

- The most valuable of Formal University is developing a personal discipline that the University of Life hardly achieved.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Universidad formal y Universidad de la Vida.

 

(This is the Article No. 1769)

●●●