No socio-economic differences, do we extinguish?

What if our species is conserved because there are rich and poor? What if our species in danger of extinction due to lack of socio-economic inequalities?

Why, when we have to solve a problem that affects many interests, formed a team (commission) with at least one member representing each of those interests?

Answer: because humans understand 100% of what affects us, and a scant 1% of what affects us NO.

What happens to us humans when one of the parties is Nature itself?

Response: there is no one able to authentically represent the Nature that role is vacant and up the committee contemplated that little 1% that you are interested in Nature.

Conclusion: When caring for the environment is literally trashed Nature.

Happily we almost insignificanates and our negligence we just slightly disturbs the powerful nature.

Almost all human beings struggle, one way or another, to combat poverty, hunger, disease, homelessness human beings. Not only fighting against the scarcity of material goods but also strive to avoid irritating inequalities between rich and poor.

What would you think an imaginary representative of Nature?

Given that this unsuccessful attempt to eradicate poverty and economic inequality is millennia old, the imaginary representative of Nature might say to us: "Do not waste time, humans! For the human species today has 7,000 million copies are essential poverty and socio-economic inequalities”.

Everything can be!

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Sin diferencias socio-económicas ¿nos estinguiríamos?

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.105)

●●●