Postmenopausal sexuality

It is normal post-menopausal women calling men to follow the fertilizing knowing that a pregnancy would be unlikely.

My idea is to tell you different perspectives on common themes, guided by psychoanalytic theory.

Several articles said that the woman, female of our species as the other females of other mammalian species, is that when you are ovulating, attracts a man, male of our species, to copulate with her and fertilizes .

Therefore, when a man courting a lady what you are doing is just showing to see if it is lucky she chooses.

The Lord Seductive merely showcase your offer as it would any other service which is sold in our market economy, for example, airlines, cadetería, dentistry.

But my own observation, that some of you can confirm or correct, makes me think that nature does not apply human consistency in their procedures.

The novelty of my observation is that women have a desire to gestate whether or not by circulating a mature egg.

Hormones may operate periodically when the female body is ready for a new fertilized egg nest and when the nest is not ready.

Recall that nature has procedures that have a much higher abundance of resources to which humans have.

She (nature) does not rationalize (save) resources: why do women continue to desire to be mothers even after menopause, when the implantation of a fertilized egg would be almost impossible.

It is therefore normal for postmenopausal women calling men to follow the fertilizing knowing that a pregnancy would be unlikely.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La sexualidad post-menopáusica.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.978)

●●●

Pets are not poor

Not to suffer many fail to identify with humans and pets give their rich life.

My prejudices are opposed to think freely. I console myself that this happens to everyone.

The prejudice more strongly opposes me is referring to people who should not have a bad time because others possess more wealth than they need for a good time.

Although not bother me or the rich or the very rich I think the world would be better if there were extremely needy people.

My bias, big, burly, it could be an efficient bodyguard of one of these super-rich do not bother me, wants me to keep thinking that these abysmal differences in the distribution of the planet's wealth are unfair and also be disturbed. My bias Herculean fearsome forces me to feel bad because many humans have material needs with which I suffer.

Although I know that prejudice is bigger than I'm mulling my rebellion and refuse to give in to his obstinacy.

Surely other people have also had to find a solution to this annoyance.

An efficient solution is to ignore desinformarse not learn that the like just have to eat, they do not have to bundle up, living in inhospitable.

Another solution is to devote hours a day to work with the poor, trying to give them some of what they lack.

But the cause of prejudice in my need for love and to feel less bad I have to work on the cause and not the symptoms.

Because I need to be loved I identify with human beings: why suffer when others suffer.

Not to suffer many fail to identify with humans and pets give their rich life.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Las mascotas no son pobres.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.959)

●●●

(Maybe) you are not me

We can theorize that "you and I are different ', but often doubt if you're not me.

Maybe it's a good philosophy of life allow everyone cares as long as there proved sufficient conditions to do so: if you have a disability to care, it seems imperative that the other, pursuant to our sole mission is to take care the species, both individually and collectively, we impose our protection until it is able to look after himself.

As we all have a public life and a private life, the above criteria also applies with adjustments as required.

Let me explain:

Capitalism (public life) does not care how sexually every citizen and the spouse (privacy) is not interested in what your partner in public.

She wants her husband to remain as nice as when they were dating but does not have to be interested in what he is like as an employee, officer, professional, entrepreneur.

But this is too theoretical and in practice does not work so well.

Because it works so well this isolation roles of scenarios of interest, we have some unavoidable interference.

- Maybe she did not want him to be late for work;

- Perhaps he advises on issues of health concerns her alone;

- Maybe the state use its power to induce certain habits communication with the pretext of improving the quality of life of its citizens;

- Maybe she is upset because he does not leave the happy hour on Friday, off from work;

- The laws tend to forget that you are not the parents of their grandchildren and intend to continue imposing its educational criteria.

In short: We can theorize that "you and I are different ', but often doubt if you're not me.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): (Quizá) tú no eres yo.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.977)

●●●

The course for parents

The "bread under the arm 'that children bring learning is a scale of values ​​definitely realistic.

've Ever heard that "children come with a loaf under his arm."

This expression means that the increase in household expenses inherent to the incorporation of a new member is solved because the child itself creates conditions that make it self-sustaining.

Those who prefer to emphasize the human spiritual condition, family planning and life itself, usually interpreted as the "bread under his arm" in a mystical sense, thinking that God will put the money missing provided prospective parents do not feel embarrassed by the economic difficulties ahead were when the woman, distraught at the news moving, thinking, "pregnant again!How can we do? "And to inform the expectant father needs to develop strategies and care to avoid scaring, or perhaps embitter him angry.

Spiritualist philosophy marks the rhythm no time.

What's "bread under the arm" was a stimulus elemental, basic, simple to sparsely trained and informed people, who had to somehow encourage to breed them and assume the workload generated by children after they are born .

The stimulus to reproduction had a goal that many would reject if it were true that the rulers wanted more young people to send them to war on behalf of insane power ambitions.

However, there is a "bread under the arm" that we can recognize as existing.

Youth who do not have your value hierarchy because they have too theoretical knowledge of what it is to live, when they conceive a child learn that nothing is more important than self-preservation and species. (1)

(1) Blog dedicado a la conservación de la especie: La única misión 

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El curso para padres

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.958)

●●●