Fecal and economic poverty Indiscretion

Perhaps prying adults with bowel movements (fecal, urinary and flatulent), retain some infantile inability to generate and manage money.

We are a few who believe in psychoanalysis as a theory that explains very well the psyche, but many more who think the contrary.

This is not serious because the scene of psychoanalysis can find good therapeutic results, logical consistency, interesting confirmations over a century.

Of course this does almost all other theories.

The best defense I can make psychoanalysis I use for my daily comments does not seem very serious, but it is nonetheless valuable: psychoanalytic explanations are quite funny, creative, artistic and original.

Those who enjoy art in any of its varied expressions almost certainly enjoy this way of understanding the psyche.

Joining several opinions, it is said that money is unconsciously associated with fecal droppings, with children, with gifts, with sexuality.

Psychoanalysts and Psychoanalysts believe that the money issues create a sort of shame, embarrassment, inhibition. It is a commodity of daily use and universal but we find disturbing.

I have the hope that the day this will happen modesty stop less poor pathological, ie those poor who would wish to be but can not.

The idea that I propose today is:

Children are inept with money: or wasted, or do not value it, or exchange it for trinkets. They fail to understand the social value (market value) you have.

Logical addition to the underdevelopment of his personality must be supervised in their stools, 'require' receiving gifts and are culturally inhibited sex.

Perhaps prying adults with bowel movements (fecal, urinary and flatulent), also retain some inability to generate and manage money.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  La indiscreción fecal y la pobreza.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.955)

●●●

Specialists 'prove' the new knowledge

The specialists of our community are responsible for "prove" the validity of each new knowledge so that we can use.

The poisons have been the most deadly weapon used by the enemies of power.

The kings, emperors, tyrants, or any other character provided some power annoying to someone, they were always liable to be killed by this stealthy procedure.

So the "friends" clinking glasses provide with such energy that the wines pass from one to the other, to mix and expose them to both if the poison had been made to kill only one of the two.

More institutionalized, a slave should eat eat food after the powerful.

Currently also taken precautions so that the powerful are not poisoned, but without exposing the life of a slave.

The above is a brief prologue to the next idea that is tasked justify this article.

The people, the citizens, the consumer public has risen to the rank of "Her Majesty".

There are strong controls on food that reaches our table. Is supreme responsibility of States to ensure that no one lives at risk of poisoning, poisoning, unhealthy.

And there are other ways to control our health. I turn now to the intellectual health.

Knowledge is now so wide that we have no more wise. No human being can know everything. So there are the specialties: groups of people who are dedicated to learn, investigate and validate each new knowledge in some area of ​​knowledge.

Economists know economics, pulmonologists know breathing difficulties, architects know of constructions.

Specialists are responsible for our community to find and confirm (test, taste) the validity of each new knowledge so we can all use it with confidence.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los especialistas «prueban» los nuevos conocimientos.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.973)

●●●

We unhappiness of others

Speaking of money doing it shames us because we could demonstrate a meanness which, if discovered, would cease to love.

Our mind is unable to cover major issues at once. When we speak of "happiness", for example, we refer to a welfare state that we sometimes feel that we would keep: we feel loved, we have energy to do what we need to do, we're bored, we're optimistic, it appears be in place.

Therefore, when we talk about a subject as broad as is "happiness", we can only think of some features of that state of mind.

If we could gather all those traits that characterize not subsidized happiness in all we energetically, looking forward with enthusiasm.

If you share this definition, we summarize a subject so comprehensive to the simple condition of "having power, desire, enthusiasm."

When we have energy, enthusiasm and excitement we are happy, when we are happy we have energy, enthusiasm and excitement. If we have each other and vice versa.

There is a universal fantasy is to be king of a people not do enough to keep us happy. The main concern of these subjects is to be happy, take care, love.

Money seems to be a suitable instrument for this fantasy. We can imagine with enough money to buy the work of people that are needed to keep us happy, healthy, excited.

In this case the money would go to purchase energy, desire, enthusiasm, basic elements of happiness.

But something overshadows our fantasy monarchy: with money something sad happens is that when you have one others do not.

We all wish that life buy King but we are ashamed to admit that while we are willing that others do not have it, we want the unhappiness of others.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Deseamos la infelicidad ajena.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.954)

●●●

Love without words but with gifts

Advertising installing blackmails us the idea that if we do it because we love gifts.

In another article (1) accused medical practices indirectly impoverish our ability to communicate through speech.

The argument is that doctors hardly listen to us because for them it is more practical to order a number of tests to try to understand the inconsistent descriptions we usually do those who consult them as a last resort, because there is no choice, frightened by the situation, fearing tragic diagnosis, imagining the implementation of invasive therapeutic procedures, bloody, excruciating, fearing drastic life change, impoverishing our quality of life, irreversible, distressing.

Do not know how to speak well because we were outside impoverishes society, we lose ability to contribute and to defend our ideas, we lose opportunities to dialogue, negotiate, claim, demand, civilized.

More than three years ago I commented in another article (2) that the development of the symbolic function that allows us to talk is essential to convert our most primitive instincts in others better adapted to civilized coexistence. For example, instead of settling our differences of opinion by violent means, we can talk, talk, persuade, or rather to reproduce without any family planning can sublimate the sexual instinct for other forms of production, better adapted to improve the quality of their own and others lives.

In this article I comment other reason we undermines the development of the symbolic function, and above all, speech.

The market economy subtly leads us to our expressions of affection are made without words and gifts.

Traders invest in advertising that blackmails us massively, installing the idea that if we do gifts on mother or grandfather or friend, do not show love them.

(1) La medicina y la pérdida del idioma

 

(2) Los hijos asalariados

 

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El amor sin palabras pero con regalos.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.953)

●●●

Homophobia, monogamy and conservation of the species

Homophobia and monogamy are social facts necessary to conserve the species, but especially suitable for the rulers.

As free will is a widespread belief but not a proven truth, doubt his existence. They are natural laws that affect us in our decision to brush our teeth.

The extreme aggressiveness and ambition specific to certain eras and peoples, we were pressured particularly concerned about the survival of the species.

By wars and plagues survival instinct feared for our continuity on the face of the Earth.

This hypothesis could explain the homophobia and monogamy.

As I have discussed elsewhere (1) learn to love the attention they receive from our mother.

The love we know is the reaction to who gives us food, shelter, protection, tenderness. For this "love is needed" and love who selflessly cares safely.

Because we learn to love a woman may think that love is a feeling chiefly reserved for a woman.

The only drawback of homosexuality has to do with the inability to fertilize.

If our species fears of extermination suffered because of wars and plagues, it is logical to think that homosexuality has become a threat as serious as a war or an epidemic.

This fear is realistic and explains homophobia.

Humans are better controlled when we belong to groups. For reasons of control individuals governments have always promoted the creation of families (father, mother, children).

The women love makes women themselves have lesbian desires and moderate interest in boys, who only are essential to impregnate.

Homophobia and necessary social monogamy but are made especially convenient for the rulers.

(1) Obligación, homosexualidad y culpa

 

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Homofobia, monogamia y conservación de la especie.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.971)

●●●