It is wise to apply the criterion whose slogan says "if I do not believe it," because it provides a little more security for himself observe what others may say.
For many it is somewhat uncomfortable confirm for themselves what they heard because, to do so, they will be blamed for this perception, while trust what others perceived allows a gate leakage using arguments like 'Oh, I do not know , I told John Doe! If I lied to blame it is my mistake. "
Therefore, for those just looking for economy of effort, without evaluating how to lose those savings, it is preferable to be trusting, gullible, naive, good-natured, with all of which manage to be "innocent", ie "free from blame ».
Arguably, most of the population has low income (poor), while rather believe in what they say rather than confirm for themselves that which guides their decisions.
Poverty is likely to be associated in some way to that position and innocent credulity that both frees us from feeling guilty.
But not only the poor refuse to confirm the information they receive from others.
People looking to find the financial resources to meet the needs and desires and those of his family, often call with an obsessive insistence, copying others ideas implemented.
The need to do what others tested denotes the attitude of the gullible who seek to be innocent. Denotes the attitude of those who blindly believe what they are told in books, teachers, leaders or me.
Nota: O texto original em
espanhol (sem tradução do Google): La
credulidad irresponsable.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.845)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario