miércoles, 24 de abril de 2013

Tenants or owners



Very easily neglect our status as co-owners of the planet because we still believe that abiding tenants are the "true masters".

We might think that we humans as life tenants of the planet but, by natural right, we have access to constitute ourselves as co-owners of the same.

In other words, because when we are born we are very dependent, immature, helpless, would not be suitable owners of a plot of the planet. With some difficulty we defend our other children's toys, screaming for help, pushing and biting.

So we entered the field host, (the planet), as users, tenants, occupants in fact intruders inhabitants.

Our rights to the place where we stand is minimal. It seems that the older tolerate our presence and use their privileges preventing us some travel and income.

Given that:

- Humans need some visible act, some ceremony, some document to understand that there was a change of state, which marked a before and after, that the situation was no longer as it was, and that

- At no time did we say that we are no longer tenants of the world to begin to be co-owners of the same,

is likely to preserve the original notion and never assume that we are not dependent citizens but citizens began to be required to obtain self-sustaining, to be co-responsible for the planet and that we have no obligation to obey any other co- owners, except that represent an institution of which we are also co-owners.

If the child does not defend their toys, other children can use them and take them to the house and if the adults do not take our true situation as responsible citizens, anyone will take advantage of our neglect and have our time, our money, our property , of our rights.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Inquilinos o propietarios.
 
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.859)

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario