Legislation by sex

As men and women who can give and take is linked to our respective anatomies and functionality, we need two legislations.

I insist that in order to learn more about the man we have to lay the prejudice that both sexes belong to the same species.

Like all prejudice gives us great peace of resolvernos a question that keeps the brain gripped by a walrus though, on simplification, we throw the baby out with the bath water.

My insistence may also be biased but at least raises an alternative that will allow us to illuminate other areas of knowledge, now relegated by obscurantism imposed belief in a single species.

It is not the same as having uterus manager humans and food breasts than none. The views of each other bodies are inevitably different, although not to transgress the prejudiced egalitarianism, we feminicemos men and women are masculinized.

Thanks to our radical inequality that can be complementary, but on the other hand, when we want to know more about and others, fall into the folly of imagining of the same species.

For being so different not deserve the same rights and obligations. Equality before the law is the worst injustice.

The socialist slogan is excellent also for the distribution of rights and obligations. When he says "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs", is saying: "For the boys have to ask them what they are capable of and what you honestly need them" and also is saying, "Women are have to ask what they can give and what you honestly need them. "

Like that we can give and take is linked to our respective anatomies and functionality, we need two legislations.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Una legislación por sexo.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.876)

●●●