Heterosexual intercourse as it is

The heterosexual act is full of misunderstandings, despite the apparent complementarity. The possible pregnancy determines a radical difference.

The following may be an accurate description of how the men and women we unite, we fertilze and, to reproduce, fulfill the unique mission (1) we have: conserve the species.

Always live in society because we are social animals. Almost all the population lives in communities of men and women.

When one goes into heat, like any other mammal, try to be fertilized by a male who already know, with whom he had any emotional attachment because likes him and, almost inevitably, he always approaches the woman who lovingly calls, watching, talking, showing that you admire, what you want, is happy in his company, I would see him often.

These are unmistakable signs that the woman has chosen to father her children.

When she is ready to be fertilized make certain maneuvers instinctive for him to have an inflammation of the penis and want desinflamarlo by fondling her practice with his hands, mouth or vagina. Only the latter favoring desinflamación achieve pregnancy.

All these movements and actions are merely anatomical and physiological. However, the participants brain abundant thoughts and fantasies segregate before, during and after intercourse.

The intensity and density of these fantasies make the organic phenomenon, (only really necessary for the conservation of the species), go to the background.

Since one and the other have very different functions (a feat and one only fertile), these fantasies are radically different. The expectation of getting pregnant imposes a high commitment. For this they assign intercourse fantastic dimension much greater than the man could imagine.

(1) Blog sobre Nuestra Única Misión

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  El coito heterosexual tal cual es.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.082)

●●●

The non-materialistic greed

 Behind an excessive ambition can find the fear of death and, paradoxically, one horrified rejection of materialism.

It's not easy to eat without hunger and not easy to drink without thirst, however, for some crazy whim of our culture, some feel that it is good to drink without thirst.

Not to forget the glass half full, there are parts of our culture that still remain healthy, which is why, for now we have mentally healthy people who are recommending eating without hunger. Hopefully it will not happen.

Something always happened is that some people strive to get more money than they need. This behavior is similar to eating without hunger, but it looks more to drink without thirst, as advise some respected, (I do not know if respectable) professionals.

This behavior seems unnatural encouraged by a strange desire to be or applaud the martyrs, that is, people who do what no one in their right mind would do.

As mentioned in another article (1), our mind is set to think that down is bad and above is good. In other words, the Law of Gravity attracts to the core of the Earth to all evil, while good is not as severe reached by law: therefore (our psyche imagines) floats in the air, the clouds will, lives in heaven.

Any psychoanalyst would suggest that people accumulating wealth beyond measure can be attached to a trauma caused by an initial feeding (breastfeeding) that generated too much anguish, insecurity, abandonment, hunger, but we can also think that a miser is paradoxically one so fearful falling in materialism, which accumulates wealth for NO DROP in poverty, which is below, which is on earth... perhaps as the bodies buried.

(1) La Ley de Gravedad no es tan grave

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La avaricia no materialista.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.064)

●●●

Fear and lack of concentration

Arguably, when someone can not concentrate is because you have a fear diffuse. We can concentrate when we attack.

Looking at nature we see that animals have adequate anatomy where they live and their natural temperament.

Thus, animals that have eyes in the frontal plane, (cats, apes, owls) are hunters and those who have eyes in the lateral plane, (horses, cows, chickens), need to take care not to be devoured.

In other words, hunters may converge their eyes to attack prey that will give them food, while the hunted can see all around without moving his head.

Hunters just look forward and the hunted look all around.

This will lead us to suppose that animals can focus his eyes, (make it converge on a point on the front), are aggressive, while animals that can see around are elusive.

With these data we observe nature what happens to humans.

Given the location front of our eyes are predatory animals. When we are threatened, or we stand with his back to a wall or we partner with other human beings so that, together, we can see around us.

Aggressive animals like us pay attention to what is ahead and we can not attend the rest of the stage, though, when we are afraid of what surrounds us, we stop paying attention focused and try to pay attention to the environment.

Looking only later in predatory attitude is stay focused and pay attention to everything a little, is to be decentralized, perhaps distracted.

When someone is concentrated in aggressive, combative, attack and when someone is decentralized is defensive, frightened.

Aggressiveness and fear we focus distracts us.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  El temor y la falta de concentración.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.081)

●●●

The law of gravity is not as serious

If we think that good is down and wrong is up not down would fear.

For many years I, located at the foot of my bed, a globe invested, ie the North Pole where he looked down.

This artistic expression is not new as many have done, contrary to the classic design where the Nordic countries over southern countries.

It may not be pure coincidence that the economically developed countries are concentrated in the northern hemisphere while they do in the underdeveloped south.

In our minds there is a dramatic and indisputable hierarchy: the best is above what is worse. The pyramid model imposes hard is axiomatic. It seems impossible to suppose the legality of a subversion of that order, our minds would oppose the worst think is above the best.

In turn, if we speak of "pyramid model", are suggesting that the majority (BOP) is down, perhaps for stability (broad-based) to the organization of the human collective.

In short, these ideas undeniable 're leaving out of the question that:

1) The best is up and that the worst is down;

2) The best is quantitatively less than the worst, ie, that the majority is less good than the minority;

3) In the above we may deduce that there is an inverse relationship between quality and quality, so that more quality is accompanied by smaller quantities and, conversely, that lower quality is accompanied by greater quantity;

Recall that it was also undeniable our location in the center of the universe.

Perhaps everything is influenced by the initial definition: If we thought that good is down and wrong is up, not down and would fear the Law of Gravity not be so bad.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  La Ley de Gravedad no es tan grave.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.063)

●●●

Strategies to ensure the fidelity of husband

For some women, economically or sexually exhaust the husband are the most effective strategies to ensure the fidelity of her husband.

Some forms of interpreting reality are essential to make things happen as they happen.

'll Figure out two situations between a man and a woman who could be examples approximate how some couples.

a) She feels she has to gastarle all the money he earns and even pressure him to give more.

In this case she feels valued as a woman if she is with a man who works to exhaustion and are deprived of their personal expenses just to keep it as she demands.

Hers is a militant attitude, probably supported by his own mother, who eventually helps to spend so that the pressure on the man to be as effective as possible.

What does this attitude?

1) To feel valuable, important, respected, considered, enthroned, put on a pedestal;

2) Make sure that he can not afford a double life keeping another family;

3) Demonstrate other women how valuable, how many amenities available, how enviable is his life;

4) Follow obeying his mom and complimenting her as Mrs. intended to make your daughter.

 b) She feels that her husband sexually exhaust.

Hers is a militant attitude, physically exhausting it is proposed, is presented as erotomaniac, pretend to be absolutely fascinated by the (imaginary) husband's physical attractiveness.

What does this attitude?

1) Feeling a female fatal, according to his understanding of the feminine and the role of women in a couple;

2) Make sure he does not have energy to have sex with other women;

3) Demonstrate other women how to do to ensure the fidelity of a man.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Estrategias para garantizar la fidelidad del esposo.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.080)

●●●

Money is working

Because our money before it was our job, all you pay is indirectly done by our own labor.

As I always, I will share with you personal reflections that we think together. I do not take the job of amplifying the ideas of others. You and I think with our heads, which we assume to be true, with the experiences we have had. The official thinking, that it is in the books because anyone cares that you and I think as the author, does not participate in this dialogue.

We can make money in two ways:

1 - Selling what we extract from a land that belongs to us, as they could be vegetables, fruits, oil, or

2 - Working either producing for whom we paid a salary or working for ourselves, in our own factory producing.

Let's see what happens to the money we get when we work (option 2).

In this case we can say that the money we charge is equal to time worked. To some extent we can adhere to the saying "Time is money", for which we would have to tweak the wording to say "Time is money worked."

Simplifying further, we may say that money is work. When we have money equivalent to the work done. Spent some time doing something with our body (muscles, brain, both) and who benefited from our efforts so remunerated with that money we now have in your pocket.

When we spend that money to buy something they really are doing is realizing that we buy. For example, if we hire a toilet to Unclog a pipe, we ourselves who the desobstruimos through it, it was our job to earn the money he charged us.

When we pay someone else's work is because before we were working.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  El dinero es trabajo.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.062)

●●●

I divide to rule me

We believe in Cartesian dualism, (we are divided into mind and body), because the powerful we apply the formula “divide and rule”.

Two sentences out there who say the same, although from different perspectives.

- “United We Stand"; and

- "Divide and rule".

In both cases appear to be of slogans designed and performed by those who want to be successful, whether it's defending or attacking.

As they say the same thing but in a different way can be used in a complementary way to reinforce the concept. For example, someone may say: "Let us unite to try to divide them".

As seen, come over here a saying: "Unity is strength".

With this other added someone could reaffirm its revolutionary cry twice, for which I would say: " Because there is strength, unite and try to prevent them from joining (try dividing)".

If still dizzy with so many phrases, sayings and slogans, let a little more because now comes the really important part of this article.

With great ingenuity humans believe to be composed of a body (material) plus a spirit (immaterial). In philosophical jargon, this belief is called Cartesian dualism, because it was Rene Descartes who proposed.

Why do you think this philosopher became so famous? My answer is that it fulfilled an infallible rule: those who directly or indirectly succeed to the powerful help.

Everything would indicate that the proposal made by Descartes is wrong: we are a human unity and if we have thoughts that seem immaterial is because what we know about the human body is too little.

In other words: we are united, we are one-piece, thoughts are organic productions that even we can not explain, but believe us divided because Descartes said it and because we undergo powerful formula we apply "divide and conquer".

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Me divido para que me gobiernen.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.079)

●●●