Beware of disqualifications

In the controversy is easy to hear how the opponents are disqualified each other, perhaps because they would like to eat, as we do with the animals that disqualify.

Let's talk about animals.

Humans eat almost any "bug to walk", but in Latin America and in Spain, Spanish speakers, we eat cows, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, fish and go closing the list because I do not need to be exhaustive.

Spanish speakers do not eat horses, dogs, cats and would close the list because I do not need to be exhaustive.

The view we have of each other is very different animals.

The animals we eat seem silly, dirty, cold and not seem to eat smart, workers, co.

Perhaps there is some arbitrariness in these ratings, as edible and non-edible animals are equally valuable, but it is worth recalling that some affection and inspire others.

Among humans is normal that when someone does not want to have to disqualify many occurrences similar: "John Doe is a fool," "is a sloppy Mengana ',' Perengano is selfish."

More or less the same level of inventiveness we have to praise: "A Sultan lacks talk," "The Spotted rider cares more than their foals," "The camaraderie Barcino is a person."

With the goodwill that characterizes us, we can outline a brief theory:

Humans ponder when someone is because we would not want to help and stop this collaboration eating it, whereas when we criticize someone, you do not help us in any case I would eat like to have the opportunity to serve some purpose.

These actions are visible, we witness how we eat animals not inspire affection and how we protect accommodating domestic slaves.

In the controversy is easy to hear how the opponents are disqualified each other, perhaps because they prefer to eat.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Cuidado con las descalificaciones

(This is the Article No. 1771)

●●●