Work and at home

One advantage of working for the state is that middle managers (heads), being subordinated to other hierarchs, have as little power as the mother.

If we realize that we are having fun not we realize how much we pay for the fun, or more generally, how much we win by having fun.

Indeed, it may happen that someone does not know how much fun, how insistent you are on the pleasure principle that governs our unconscious.

For Pleasure Principle can understand the trend, largely unconscious, to seek pleasure and avoid pain.

I propose to think of something that can happen to everyone, but only in some work as say below.

A child can enjoy their childhood because, although reprimanded and even punished by his mother, note she also undergoes a similar authoritarian husband.

Part of the bonus is that the child may fantasize about a supposed alliance between him and the highest authority (the father), because when he gets angry with her mother for nagging and punishment tip she feels that the father's attitude toward her amounts to a kind of revenge on the part of an alliance never made ​​explicit.

The welfare could disqualify summarized authority that governs it, "She gives me orders me but other orders given to it."

Why someone can stay and work where not suit you, having possibility of having another occupation more profitable?

It is a typical case of pathological poverty.

The government jobs are traditionally underpaid, but officials want to spend hardly private sector.

In addition to a supposed job security, many state workers feel at home because the bosses have so little power as the mother.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Trabajar como en la casa.

(This is the Article No. 1759)

●●●