The role of "thing" there

Humans have the habit vehemently demand freedom but quietly seek membership in a prestigious master.

The word "homeland" is derived from "father" but as is female, then here we have something paradoxical that allows me to reflect and to write an article.

What does this mean "the father" (for "homeland")? It sounds so strange as it were "the mother."

Should we assume that "the country" is an androgynous, a hermaphrodite, a person or figure with masculine and feminine traits simultaneously?

Sometimes we find that the word "homeland" is closely linked to the word "nation", which clearly refers to "birth", "place of birth", "great home".

They are abstract concepts to define them as needed to take some risks, be a little bold to say the cheeky.

Humans ask to be free but we prefer the subordination screaming almost inaudibly.

This taste for belonging to a country, a nation, a political party, a religion or a family, is telling us that we humans like to belong, be someone, be slaves of some love.

Of course in this case never made ​​it that way "Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are."

A slave could have possessions but these can not be more valuable than himself. They can not even enforce the same. For example, the Lord can own Ten lords Nine, Eight, etc., But can not own (master) or other Lord let alone Ten lords Eleven, Twelve, etc.

People love to belong to someone or something (political institution, for example), can feel like a master membership but do not show signs of taking charge of everything that involves owning responsible or single administrator.

The role of "thing" there.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El rol de «cosa» existe.

(This is the Article No. 1754)

●●●