Protect the weak without disturbing the strong

Almost all nations implement policies which protect the weak without disturbing the more powerful too.

I belong to the group of capitalist and consumerist moderate.

I think that capitalism is the best system for organizing individuals profoundly selfish, liars and idealists, who become caring, a little something sincere and pragmatic threat only when the expectation of extinction, or ethnic group.

On the contrary, I have the feeling that the other system, the socialist, is favorable for the selfish, liars and idealists are radicalized in their falsehoods until the money of capitalists who fleece, is depleted.

In short, although every time we talk about capitalism and its traditional opponent of socialism, think in economic terms, ultimately it is a matter of freedom.

You may think that there are not really poor and rich but rather slave and free.

Indeed, in capitalism the poor have no freedom to choose because they can not live like rich given its limited resources and can not become destitute because this would fail to satisfy the basic needs (food, for example).

In capitalism all non-poor are free to choose: they can live in abundance and can live in austerity, because having sufficient resources are administered each personal taste.

By contrast, in socialism these differences are resolved in the worst way: anyone is free to choose and so there will be no envy, resentment or distributive injustice.

As can be seen, neither of the two systems work well alone.

Almost all nations implement policies which protect the weak without disturbing the more powerful too.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Proteger a los débiles sin molestar a los fuertes.

(This is the Article No. 1753)

●●●