Anyone who says publicly that homeownership is a right, predisposes to a confrontation between citizens.
Until a century ago kiss on the mouth to a tubercle was not worrying ... rather, it was very dangerous, as now, just that no one thought to think that the disease was contagious.
Currently it is possible to live together and have sex with an HIV positive or who have AIDS, provided that they take minimal precautions.
Just as in every age just ran risks long after they knew that this was the cause of an untimely death, we may think that we are currently doing the same thing we're doing something that will bring serious harm but, not being aware, we so.
For example, if we express without anyone edit, home ownership is a right, we are really saying that the person is authorized to commit various acts that help you recover a right that can not be enjoyed for reasons beyond their will.
In a similar way we also say that we all have the right to health, to food, to education, to protect us from the cold, to be parents and have material resources to serve them with dignity.
Not this way of expressing naive and perhaps is generating social pressure perceive consequences only when we realize collectively.
It's very different, to say that as a people is our dream that one day all owning some small part of the territory they occupy, to say that we all have the right to own that parcel.
In this case, those who believe the verbatim that owning your home to become legal citizens allowed to require you to supply a home, we annoyingly predisposing to non-owners against the owners.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La infección lingüística.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.984)