Almost all unjustified jealous because they are wrong. For others believed identical to assume that others will choose the same male.
It's likely that I'm wrong, but equally likely to be right. The truth is not valid for the number of believers, it is a consensus that became a hypothesis, a theory, a belief, indeed confirmed.
However, as we depend herd instinct as to be loved, many times we ignore the intellectual rigor and adhere to some idea as true for the sole reason to feel closer to loved ones who also think the same.
Sometimes passionately defend some ideas, beliefs, rituals, political parties, ideologies, because other loved ones also defend. Instead of supporting what our own intelligence has been validated we join a certain posture as he marries and becomes the son-spouse's parent.
In other words, some people emotionally attached to certain ideas and also emotionally, out of love, as an act of faith, defend them with the same fervor that deserves to be defended an unquestionable truth.
Several articles have proposed the idea that women, when they need to be mothers, choose precisely who will father their children, while men love women that choose and if you choose more than one simultaneously (something that rarely happens) will struggle to mate only with one of them.
A woman would suffer jealousy justified if it finds another woman casually want the same man to father her children.
But almost all unjustified jealous because they are wrong: as identical to imagine other women believe that all elect the same man that them.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los celos injustificados.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.983)