The irresponsibility and free will

Describe, understand and document in writing the terms of our coexistence is only useful for some of those who believe in free will.

Humans can belong to one of two categories:

a) Those who prefer to speak, clarify, engage, explain, describe, terms of bonding, of a business relationship or employment, living standards established in our collective and

b) Those who prefer to do the opposite do not like to talk about these issues, preferring to think about how they are minimally involved, which can be understood by the business or employment relationship, they want to ignore the laws and standards of living of their society.

Somehow both groups are also characterized by their relation to knowledge: The first and the second would rather know prefer to ignore.

From these characteristics shows that the first prefer "clear things" and predictable, while the latter are better off in confusion, anarchy and improvisation.

From a very general point of view, none of the two options is better than the other as humans we can admit that we do not decide anything but nature takes care of inducing behaviors that seem to be taken in an alleged use of free will, but in reality are determined by a number of unidentified factors beyond our control (genetic, biological, cultural, incidental and many more).

For those who believe that humans are responsible for our actions, it is very important to all the terms of coexistence rather clear, explicit and if possible, documented in writing.

Some people do something different: to believe in free will but prefer the absence of contracts and ignore the rules of behavior because they want everyone to be very studious and disciplined but reserving the right to be lawless and irresponsible.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La irresponsabilidad y el libre albedrío.

(This is the Article No. 1799)

●●●