viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2012

Hypotheses about spitting in public



You may think that men who spit in public, unconsciously believe they ejaculate before imaginary preferred sexual objects.

It often happens that people psychoanalysis lovers enjoyed the novels, especially detectives like us insightful, attentive to details that are significant only for those with a particularly acute powers of observation, meticulous, obsessive.

In fact, when Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) gave birth to literary detective Sherlock Holmes, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), a lover of literature and a better writer than psychoanalyst, was young and even more passionate in his old age.

Before proceeding, carefully observe the similarity in the ages of birth and death.

Good detectives, besides collecting data that others perceive, are major manufacturers of hypotheses.

One hypothesis is the "Assumption of something possible or impossible to make it a sequel." (1)

Before continuing, note carefully that it is an "assumption possible or impossible."

Not that the thought extravagant gets the best results, but common sense is sufficiently served by most thinking beings.

Radically change the subject.

It is common to see how much of men accustomed spitting in public. If we observe carefully what gesture do when running its launch, we will see that one of total indifference, as one performs a routine task.

Why are people so far have a habit of good manners, elegance and environmental health?

An impossible hypothesis says that they, unconsciously feel they ejaculate salivary and do so with the same gestures that look carefully at any mammal when coupled with the female in heat, that is, without any expression of emotion.

It would also be possible to think that if we look carefully sex public oral ejaculation witnessed that we can infer what their sexual unconscious.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Hipótesis sobre los escupitajos en público.

 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario