Psychoanalysis right and left medicine

The poor majority because collectivist discourse, (left and physician) can match only impoverishing the rich.

Start with an arbitrary definition to tune with those readers who can accept it.

I assume you do not need perfect agreements to work together. With a few more matches minimal effort, we can meet many different people.

This arbitrary definition says that leftist ideologies have as one of its main objectives to achieve the greater good of all humanity, while right-wing ideologies have as one of its main objectives to achieve the greater good of each of the individuals composing humanity.

In other words: the left work for the group as a whole, as if it were a single individual while working rights for each of the individual members of the species.

I propose that the analysis think supports a right view of the medicine while supporting a left viewpoint.

Psychoanalysis is individualistic (right) because he understands that healing is to help everyone to be as it is, while medicine is collectivist (left) because he understands that cure is to force everyone to be like everyone else.

The left display a speech laying themselves as the most humane, generous, tolerant while emphasizing their differences with stating that these rights are individualistic, selfish and intolerant.

The humanitarian discourse of the left makes his views are present in the public discourse of a majority of people. The individualist discourse of rights makes their views are not present in the public discourse of a majority of people.

The poor are most collectivist because speech can match only impoverishing the rich.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Psicoanálisis de derecha y medicina de izquierda.

(This is the Article No. 1757)

●●●