The bad example of Housewives

The "housewives" emit a signal that contradicts what you are advised to future workers.

We always say that the wages of workers is almost entirely determined by its productive capacity.

We 'face prophet "to say that children and youth should study, learn a trade or access a university degree and professional.

It seems necessary or essential to know a 'second language', if possible, English.

We affirm as something found that wage levels are "tied" (proportional), training and productivity that workers have.

Another truth that deserves discussion concerns the level of commitment that has the employee with the employer's interests. In other words, he will be well paid to defend the interests of the employer with such passion and loyalty as if the owner himself.

A highly desired remuneration is to have a role of command responsibility to be achieved leading a group of workers, have staff in charge, give orders, assessed, monitored, sanctions, make decisions that affect the lives of others.

I say that this is a fee, because for many people having power is more attractive than money. Those with power of decision, surely earn good salaries but the truth is that the main perk is perhaps not the money but the power, the feeling of power.

If you look one by one the different aspects that I listed above, we can see how high degree of similarity between what an employee must do to receive a rewarding remuneration and you have to make a housewife, mother of boys, sometimes Also head of household, not charging anything.

The signal is radically contradictory and it is to an extent that could be a sign of poor pathological generator.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El mal ejemplo de las amas de casa.

(This is the Article No. 1723)

●●●