In other articles I have proposed that the human reproductive model starts when the woman is ovulating and looking for a male that fertilizes. This male is not any but that which instinct tells you to be the best provider to improve genetic species (1).
From these determinations instinctive (the time of ovulation and a certain male), events will follow the paths set by each culture (courtship, cohabitation, marriage). At the end of this journey, through pregnancy, newborns have another copy.
If this description is correct, we see that the breeding pair not perform voluntary acts but obeys instincts: she calling him a certain man and giving him the semen that fertilize.
But do not act using only the natural mandates but culture works like second nature, distorting our actions.
Indeed nature does not claim that there are marriages but simply imposes the reproductive phenomenon. It is the cultural imposition which tells us that we must come together, live in the same housing, enroll their children in a certain records and so on.
I believe that this interpretation of the facts is what allows us to understand why humans tend to separate after having had one or more children. Consistently find that that wonderful feeling that was pledging undying love had a much shorter duration than desired.
Perhaps in this same description we find the answer: the coexistence of very different reproductive act. Once she feels he has been fertilized by the male instinct told him his interest he can continue or not.
Note: Original in
Spanish (without translation by
Google): Por
qué los padres se separan.
(1)
Some mention of the term 'women choose
men':
(This is the Article No.
1737)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario