A question with multiple answers

Some conflicts occur when people do not support dialogue that same question can be answered in several different ways.

One cause of endless misunderstandings relates to the difference between lies and conceptual mistake.

When two people assume that there is only truth possible, while not agree on that one opinion may believe that the other person, not that I'm wrong but is lying, because "everyone knows that (for example), So-is the best football player. "

The anger that arises from a discrepancy usually this cause: both assume that the other is attacking with a lie.

If I admit that there are several answers to the same question (eg, what is the best football player?), I readily admit that my interlocutor may have a different response to mine, but I am sure there one true answer, I will have no choice but to conclude that the other person, but know that one possible answer, lie becomes infatuated by some interest in having unhealthy to me.

When we think our partner is wrong, we can feel sorry for him, maybe we pity, we could even feel the urge to remove the error that accidentally fell.

This mood may be slightly offensive to the other.

However, when we assume that the other "knows that John Doe is the best football player, but nevertheless is willing to bother telling me that the best player is Mengano" then war is declared and is hitting only remains to reason remains in possession of the strongest.

This happens to all those who are confident and do not support more than one answer for each question.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Una pregunta con varias respuestas.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.827)

●●●