Propaganda
such as "Let us beware more!" Perhaps generates more precautions in
women, (essential), and more careless in men (expendable).
In addition to the known anatomical differences, men and women are so different that even have different lives, not only in terms of duration, (they live longer than them), but also our assessment scales differ.
Since the only mission of any living thing is to preserve their species (1), mammals have to give our females the leading role they deserve.
They are much more important because they are able to fully gestate a new copy from the minimum stimulus of a sperm that fertilizes the egg.
As if this were not enough, they are also capable of feeding your body for several months, so that we might even suggest that pregnancy lasts nine months the amount of breastfeeding plus 6, or 15 months.
But as mothers are especially prepared for the breeding of new human beings, they still have the leading role in the one mission (to conserve the species), for decades.
This information comes to men and I think we assume that we have a strong tendency to take risks as vital male trait that identifies us.
In other words, men like to do dangerous things we love and heroism nonsense that can cost amputations, disability and life.
If we are very manly taking risks and assuming that we are particularly expendable, then you probably also have an adverse reaction that governments increasingly agitated preventionists campaigns of accidents and diseases.
It is likely that the type propaganda "Let us beware more!" Generate many necessary precautions in women and most men neglect expendable.
Note: Original
in Spanish (without translation by Google): La
prevención de enfermedades y accidentes.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.850)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario