The dangers of socialism

According to this reasoning, for whom we recognize stupid or naive, socialist social contexts are more dangerous than capitalist social contexts.

We can all imagine a fox in sheep's clothing and we know that with that outfit can enter any henhouse to savor some of its inhabitants.

What is difficult for us to imagine a socialist disguised individualistic. Therefore we can not perceive the damage they do when in power.

With these two examples we can conclude that the most dangerous is the costume, as well as the individualistic foxes loose chickens defenses activated and voters, respectively.

Another timely reflection could provide that for some reason no fox costumes and individualistic.

This leads me to one conclusion: the most dangerous are the lambs and the Socialists because one does not know whether they are true or disguised, by doubts should depart from any of those ways (real or perceived).

Caramba! I have another conclusion: Our nature is better prepared to circulate among foxes and lambs individualists and socialists.

Indeed, our survival instinct with its immunogen system is provided so that we are alerted to the dangers but abandon us when external stimuli, (lamb costumes and socialist), are reassuring.

This line of thinking could lead to a reliable strategy whereby it is preferable to live in social contexts aggressive but honest to live in social contexts kind, charitable and philanthropic but of questionable honesty.

We should accept that natural predators, (selfish, exploitative, capitalist, unscrupulous), seek to take advantage of the gullible who can not detect disguised, simulators, hypocrites.

For these reasons and because I know I'm weak, vulnerable and naive I sound dumb, I prefer to capitalists and distrust blatant socialist generous.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los peligros del socialismo.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.828)

●●●