Pets and inmates

There are similarities between households with pets and pet prisons and incarcerate criminals because in order to humanize them.

No respect for common sense thinking is fun for some and irritating to others.

Those who pay attention to my productions written and filmed, have fun. "We are few but good", say some incorrigible nonconformist.

Something in my head can be comparable if common sense does not consider it so.

They are comparable with citizens prison inmates to be reeducated to households with one or more pets.

So I'm comparing the convicts with pets, and prisons with households of humans and nonhumans.

In both places, the masters and the care that jailers caught escaping, but to maintain the fiction that they differ, it is said that pets are lost or misplaced while prisoners abscond.

In fact one another run away or get lost. So are comparable.

The master gives your pet food, healthcare, shelter and penal institutions do the same with the inmates.

Household pets fulfill the task of giving the master the feeling that he is a superior being, and prisoners to give us the feeling that other citizens are superior because they are more honest and obedient.

Pet owners are proud of them and sometimes exaggerate saying "my animal is so intelligent that we need to talk."

The word "animalada" (stupidity, barbarism, savagery), in Spanish (1), refers to a mistake own 'animals'. Therefore we assume that prisons are institutions seeking to "humanize" who behaved as pets.

Conclusion: pets and imprison criminals to humanize them.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Mascotas y presidiarios.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.838)

●●●