In the New Testament, Luke tells a short story told by Christ to explain his philosophy on what is right and what is wrong, he said.
This story is in Chapter 15 and verses occupies the number ranging from 11 to 33 (1).
The story goes that the smaller of the two sons of a peasant father asked half his rightful property under the laws of the time.
The young man left, he spent all the money and returned to the father, to apologize and to rejoin the family.
When the father saw was so happy to get that organized an expensive party, whereupon the older brother was offended because he considered unfair this agasajo who had abandoned them and had squandered part of the family fortune.
I believe, the current readers of this parable, (the prodigal son), we are outraged with the child and the parent fails to understand as tolerant and unfair to his eldest son.
Apparently the father reacted so elated because he had left for dead at the abandoned child.
As I am against almost all Christian philosophy because I think it is a decisive factor in global poverty, I have an interpretation in line with this position, so it is not wise to give more importance (my interpretation).
According to psychoanalysis, the parent's behavior can entendrse assuming that this was so angry that I want to kill him intimately. I figured as experiential so that when they appeared surprised that even still alive.
The celebrated father to feel freed from the guilt of homicide (filicide).
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation
by Google): La
parábola del hijo pródigo y muerto.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.839)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario