We asked who defend our desire

When we doubt whether to make it as enjoyable or more convenient, we consulted who surely will recommend pleasant.

The precautions we take to make mistakes are wise, intelligent, neat, almost infallible.

I repeat: the precautions we take to make mistakes, not to hit, to avoid doing the right thing, are mostly effective, except that we have bad luck and end up doing things right.

What usually happens is that we broke some conflict in our mind that we doubted whether we will do what we like or do what is best for us.

It happens that everyone thinks you should do what is rationally correct but when you happen to be rational by all means avoid the inconveniences that could arise.

The rationale is that thinking culture, which custom has established as the 'ought', the morally right, what we defend those who have more power, such as doctors, priests, rulers.

What we like is what is suggested by instinct, by our true essence, by the natural functioning of our body, the emotions they love us.

The conflict is ultimately the ongoing struggle between the repressive culture and libertarian desire, between what others like and what we like personally, from what we have to obey your commands that govern our lives and what we have according to obey the mandates of the Nature that governs our lives whenever possible, provided that manages to escape from attempts to dominate others, take advantage, exploit.

In this struggle trying to "get right with God and the Devil", but if we decided to consult others' opinions will be sure that we will recommend what we like and did the best we try to avoid.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Consultamos a quien defienda nuestro deseo.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.913)

●●●