viernes, 28 de septiembre de 2012

Distrust scientific



There is a "scientific distrust 'through which we can continue to look with confidence, truths better than we already have.

Probably the essential fact about whether mental health is acceptable, is unfriendly, annoying, irritating. I mean doubt.

Most of the mental processes rigid, immutable, stereotyped, are a characteristic of mental performances problematic.

Of course it can also happen that doubt is the rigid: a person who can not help but doubt is also in trouble. Who can never change task never terminates because what you are doing, have a compulsion that is far from healthy.

As we see, mental disorders are more difficult to diagnose the flu, a broken bone or a rash illness.

Despite this irritating level of relativism, in some terms we can agree.

The paranoia, psychosis also called interpretive characterized because their are so systematized delusions (coherent, structured) that seem wonderful perceptions of reality in which the mortifying DOUBT is absent. The paranoid that explains his adamant view, never be convinced otherwise: is pathologically safe.

When a paranoid distrust of anything, all he found no evidence to support any doubt: if you think you pursue all of its situation hesitate but him.

However pathological distrust is not a way of thinking for the advance of science.

This type of "scientific distrust" is useful for not believing that the truths are truths final but can be confident that there are other truths better.

The great hope that is not the last word on any subject is encouraged by the "scientific distrust."

This mega distrust encourages us to think that humanity has not yet reached the goal.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La desconfianza científica.

(This is the Article No. 1702)

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario