On the possession of persons

If someone feels another person's own ambition is satiated and no longer want to have anything else.

Many times I comment with you that it is possible to make comparisons, metaphors, traspolaciones from one topic to another with the possibility of extracting a hypothesis that now, or one day, can be useful to us.

In this case liken stomach capacity with the ambition to own.

It is worth recalling here another text on the 'ambition', as this word originally meant to explore the environment, territory, looking for something to eat, something useful, something for fun.

In the same text said that originally the word 'ambition' was linked to the action of 'loitering'.

Indeed these ideas are comparable to our food while eating with great appetite seems to seek, prowl, get with ambition.

Both hunger and greed have any limits.

Although it is more noticeable in the eating, satiety as is known to all, ambition also has its limits because there comes a point where nothing that we have not yet is attractive, desirable, necessary.

The purpose of this paper is to propose a hypothesis of why some people suffer from poverty pathological, ie that annoying and inevitable shortages.

Many people feel that the possessive pronoun "me" really means possession. For example, when they hear, no one to correct, "my son," "my father," "my spouse" may believe owners son, father and spouse.

If someone feels another owner is very likely that his ambition has reached the limit and you do not feel like having anything else. In these cases we would have a pathological poverty because it fills the imaginary possession, it feels good, no more needs.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Sobre la posesión de personas.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.911)

●●●