Some people, before a ban backwards react because they feel encouraged to make such acts prohibited.
As I have said more than once we understand our way of life if we give up the limitations imposed on us consistency.
Being consistent is a purpose that limits us to think freely. So'm allowed to say that attachment to consistency is a form of self imprisonment.
Taking advantage of this permission not be consistent, say that the surest way to end up incarcerated in a certain prison is to be serving a sentence in another jail.
May have its advantages to choose jail because not all are equally unpleasant. Some seem more comfortable.
For these reasons someone may prefer intelligently auto shut in the prison in an obsession to finish in the main prison in the country.
Everyone knows your desires, fantasies, intentions, machinations, daydreams, morbidities, perversions, illegal, scams, fraud, commit heinous crimes have someone inside and that can lead to real prison, the worst, the overall confinement and permanent, hell, the worst punishment imaginable.
It's luck. Some people are born with a strong proclivity to want exactly what his group has expressly prohibited.
Moreover, some people are born with a strong adverse reaction bans as they are forced to commit the crime, rather than deter them as most. For some people the prohibitions are exciting, stimulating, evil, tempting. For these people a ban becomes an obligation of doing what should not be.
For those people who react so differently than it does the rest, is good enchalecares in a good obsession, fixed ideas that deviate from badly tempting ideas.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La obsesión como cárcel salvadora.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.940)