When some women argue viciously about the irresponsibility of those which failed to prevent pregnancy, overestimate their self.
This is the third article that drafted on the decriminalization of abortion (1).
The reasons to oppose abortion is permitted by law seem obvious and those opposed to the practice principal resort to that argument: a child conceived as a human being should be struck by the right to life to all constitutions consecrate world.
For some reason we do not have clear enough, man has always practiced abortion and that has cost the lives of many women who want to be mothers.
It is the source of many misunderstandings practice of judging people by comparing their acts with an ideal model that tells us "how we should be."
This ideal model is radically absent, no one is like him is so pure and perfect that can only exist in the imagination but it can never be found in people of flesh and blood.
Despite this non-existence of model, we persist in using it to say what is right and what is wrong.
In the case of abortion it is the same: those who appeal to defend that article of the Constitution which defends our lives do not notice sometimes met and sometimes not.
Surely those who appeal to the constitutional wishful honestly believe they never would practice an abortion and need to think that because to do so would be threatened by a painful disappointment of themselves.
When cruelly argue about the irresponsibility of women who failed to prevent pregnancy because they need to assume that they know how to control your instincts, desires, intentions.
I can assure you not know!
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El instinto reproductivo es incontrolable.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.933)