The platforms of social networks expelled, with cold justice, users less pleasant for most.
One thing we can say with descriptive spirit, though not qualified, is that young people in general always have had a strong interest in "look like" and very afraid of losing friends for being too different.
A basic answer to this feature is that adolescence is the stage in which troubled our childhood begins to expel us, forcing us to take adult attitudes, pleasant and unpleasant.
We are excited to make decisions, walking without mandatory tutoring company, involved in adult conversations. We displease lose the privileges of childhood: to live without work, own the right to play, receive many gifts.
Social networking (Facebook, Twitter, Myspace) offer instant messaging that lets users instantly know what they are doing, thinking or reading friends to do the same.
For this to work with the participation of millions of users simultaneously requires that the platform automatically react as if it were a centralized government.
Human administrators of each Network report written about what is expressly forbidden to do, but this list is not exhaustive as socially inconvenient behavior of humans generates broad list of prohibitions, higher than the Biblical Ten Commandments.
So that platform contains drivers (algorithms) that can only be deduced by how they are produced warnings, suspension, or cancellation blockages in the accounts of users, caused by something that, according to the ruling programming, should be prevented or punished.
This dark area of "cyber ruling" generates a certain paranoia but ultimately what it achieves is to remain operational users whose spontaneous behavior generates less discomfort in the virtual community.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La convivencia fríamente controlada.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.956)