It is not mandatory to have children

Future generations would benefit from the new marriages ordenáramos them only have children when they want them passionately.

Although the situation can still "throw butter on the roof", with seven billion copies in our species, we can afford to soften the millennial mandate to have children, dying, remain replacements.

Until ten years ago, it was shameful for men and women to marry, most likely before the law (civil marriage) and also before God (religious marriage).

After completed this first commitment to society, the pressures began a flirtatious "what, by when...?", Because the couples were ordered to have at least two children, and if they were a male and a girl, even better.

The goal was elementary : the father a boy and a girl knew the species, at the death of the parents, that the children would have to maintain the human stock.

The situation is changing and that imperative mandate may start to lose effectiveness.

We were forbidden to exercise this option homosexuality because sex is sterile. However, increasingly, laws are passed that allow that possibility, so much match it with heterosexuality. In many countries call, (writing from Argentina and Uruguay), marriage, both the union between two people of different sexes as a union between two people of the same sex.

Therefore, to the fact that our species has a number of copies which drives the specter of extinction, it is no longer necessary to retain a reproduction intensive and wish to live together who are not pressured to have at least two children.

Future generations would benefit from the new unions now I do not have children ordenáramos except that passionately wish.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google):  Ya no es obligatorio tener hijos.

 

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.050)

●●●