It is reasonable that we enjoy eating when we are hungry, or that we enjoy going to bed to sleep when we are tired, or abrigándonos rejoice when we are cold.
All pleasure obtained by satisfying a need seems to be in harmony with the instinct of individual preservation and, ultimately, of the species.
From this point of view we enjoy fulfilling our unique mission: to keep us as individuals and as a species (1).
For similar reasons, it is also reasonable that we enjoy fornicating for reproductive purposes, but is it reasonable to commit fornication using barrier methods? If you have sex without reproductive purposes is like eating without hunger, or lie down without being tired or shelter us without feeling cold.
If we go another little we may think something quite absurd:
If anorexics are met (like everyone else) eating, but then they spit, interrupting the natural process that aims to feed stored as individual who have sex with barrier methods are also interrupting the natural process that aims to keep playing the species.
In the same line of reasoning, having sex using contraception might be called 'reproductive anorexia. " While eating disorders can lead to serious consequences if individual, this other practice (contraception) may also have consequences not so serious but collective.
For example, this could contraceptive action generarnos guilt, so difficult to understand because their cause is hidden by custom, as is normal for most sex using contraception.
A few years ago I proposed the idea that orgasm tantamount to remuneration nature assigned us to conserve the species (2). Guilt may come from unspecified "charge without work" ie cheat nature.
Note: Original in Spanish (without
translation by Google): La
anticoncepción culpable.
(This is the Article Nº 1.706)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario