Every time we
do compete against opponents and against our natural fear of being punished for
our destructive intentions in an effort to win.
It is normal to think that an adult is naive when innocent, unsuspecting, inexperienced, naive and gullible, but hardly think that is comfortable, apathetic, indifferent, opportunistic, ignorant or abusive.
Is that the second set of attributes is false and therefore never think or is that prejudicially we are predisposed to think that the ingenuity in an adult is a valuable attribute?
To participate in the labor market in a country dominated by capitalist criteria, be naive equates to suffer an intellectual disability, except that such naivete is impostada (acted, simulated) to go unnoticed, to avoid aggression circulating among non- disabled, to use as a disguise needed to implement a particular strategy (1) business.
In the labor market functions zero-sum logic (2), because the vacancies, jobs, opportunities are limited and the location does one leave out all the rest.
Those who were not working there are occasional enemies, opponents are trying to overthrow the winner appealing to all the resources they have available.
The resources that are available depend on the degree of actual innocence that has (suffers??).
Almost all participants in any recruiters know of these circumstances, but we can take them into account by the degree of realism that we have.
We were all brought up to respect the rights of others, to control our impulses hetero-aggressive, disciplined went through painful forms of coercion, we learned that our competitive zeal exposes us to be punished.
Every time we do compete against opponents and against our natural fear of being punished for our destructive intentions in an effort to win.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El
temor a nuestras intenciones competitivas.
(This is
the Article Nº 1.692)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario