In a brief monologue (1) I said that romantic love is a form of irresponsibility, a very human way to wash your hands for at least giving the most to benefit from a false link with childhood traits.
The D.R.A.E. does not define what is "romantic love," but it does define what is "platonic love" (2), informing us that relates to love "idealized and no sex."
Therefore, we can say that "romantic love" is equal to "crush" plus "sexual intercourse."
When we speak of "sexual intercourse" are talking about re-productive activity ... not to mention that most of the time we make using barrier methods usually economic reasons, since our material reality prevents us from successfully raising many children.
As we are emerging economic elements because "sexual intercourse" refers to economic exchange (barter, buy-sell) and when we mention the re-production we are referring to production.
Our tendency to make the least effort (3) mixed with a moral discourse altruistic, generous, honest, philanthropic, responsible, generous and supportive, results so discredited the hypocrisy, since the genuine impulse of our species is far to accompany these cultural pretensions.
For this chain of reasoning we approach the focus of this article: the "romantic love" is a model of hypocrisy because its logic is to handle abstract ideas, ideals, fanciful, so that everyone can get the other handing him the greatest advantage minimum.
The speech might be "I love you because you're wonderful, you work more than me because you're omnipotent and I (contributed little because) I love you so much weakened."
The commodity charge is love and love is romantic abuser.
Note: Original in Spanish (without
translation by Google): El amor
mercantil
(Este es el
Artículo Nº 1.686)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario