The word that I find most difficult is easy to write: "analyzability". If I could think of including it in the VIDEOcomentario that accompanies each item would have to try it several times.
But the meaning is as simple as writing: refers to the possibility that some have to participate in an analysis.
Not everyone can participate, for some people is an impossible job.
Today I met one of these cases and, thanks to him, I can make a comment.
They are unable to participate in the analysis who can not leave the conviction that all think, feel and have the same intentions as them.
Before proceeding with an analysis, almost all think so: we take as a reliable reference, we assume that everyone likes chocolate ice cream, we all hate the same politicians and that we have to educate the children of a single way possible.
People " analyzable " dulcificarán this conviction to accept sincerely believe that our way of life is as diverse as fingerprints and, with a little more therapeutic success, we accept that there are no good or bad fingerprints, but in anyway, we'll like some more than others.... As you probably accept that "about tastes there is nothing written”, we can also assume that personal tastes legislative worthless for others.
This latest effort will free us from that amount of energy we consume. I mean the prosecution, trial and punishment of those who violate our "personal laws".
This task of criticizing those who think differently is complicated because no one abides by our private law.
With these very brief descriptions can understand why psychoanalysis promises to facilitate our existence.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Aunque seamos parecidos, nadie es igual a otro.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.033)