Review suggest that believers assume what the other believers as to whether they are as predictable as you imagine.
Hardly two believers in God believe in the same.
Typically, believers are dedicated to check their respective views on how to define their god, what are their characteristics, which things he would never do, do you think He of us, what are the terms in which they can dialogue with Him .
In short, believers in God believe that all believers are equal and that matches that belief, makes uniforms nearly identical.
Part of that thinking believer that others (believers) are predictable, feel they are part of a brotherhood because, sharing the idea, assume that you know, that respect the same codes that share the same values, ethics, morals.
This agreement remains precisely because, like it or not, try not to test how similar actually pose shrewdly that the check could shed disappointing results because everyone believes in God in their own way.
In this hypothesis it is concluded that there are many gods as fingerprints. If it is assumed that it is a monotheism polytheism is more radical.
Although I do not believe in the existence of God, I am convinced that there are many people who do believe and act upon that belief.
As the religious phenomenon has the strange peculiarity that is rationally untenable, but which is present in many intelligent brains, educated and responsible, I wish to share this comment because it is in keeping with the theme of the blog: pathological poverty and how to avoid it.
In short: do not be a waste of time for believers to review what they presuppose the other believers as to whether they are as predictable as you imagine.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Tantos dioses como huellas digitales.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 1.996)