The discussions between two people of different sexes are a predisposing phenomenon of fertilization or the unwavering rejection.
I rely heavily on conventional wisdom, but, yes, guided by his speech latent pointing that unconscious contents.
The sayings are wonderful... but can not be interpreted literally. Condense millennia of practical wisdom, but express it with a level of superficiality so basic that seem childish. They use common words, general, not specific. To be remembered by as many users tend to force the meaning just to add rhyme.
It is characteristic of wisdom a sentence that says, "These two are fighting so that they will end up marrying", alluding to the striking arguments between a man and a woman who barely know.
What can be of real conceals a verbal misunderstanding sexual desire?
Every few items I have the need to evoke the belief that living beings have no other mission (1) to conserve the species to which they belong.
This statement brings with another premise inescapable basic instincts can not be other than conservation ( the individual) and sexual (reproductive ).
I approach to answer the question ( "What can have real...?"), Saying now that an adversarial relationship is a subsequent natural history attraction.
It is the only possible antecedent. Apparently those who do not understand, become irritated, both excited and this excitement can lead to a passionate attraction and fertilizing, and can lead to a rejection but equally passionate intercourse impossible.
To answer the question, saying that discussions between two people of different sexes are a phenomenon predisposing toward a possible sexual attraction including fertilization or to a continuous and unwavering rejection.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Las discusiones reproductivas.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.022)