Dress and species conservation

If for some reason we humans could think of slow population growth would be expected that nudity became fashionable.

I do not think another animal, big as humans, have such abundant as our population there: we are 7,000 million.

I emphasize the size because rodents, insects, microbes are probably many more.

I accepted this statement by giving, I wonder how we did to get to this domain, since we are so weak and dependent premature.

Propose a single idea but expressed by two examples. We are many by our attachment to the forbidden.

Indeed: The prohibition of incest may be the cause of the least talked about. Incest is a taboo for both practice to talk about it. That is why we are so prolific and lovers copulate.

Banning show without clothes may be the cause of much talk but is not regarded as a factor that favors the conservation of the species.

Note that when we are most unclothed, cover the genitals and, in women, the breasts, because it is something intensely associated with our early childhood.

Unable to see or the genitals of both sexes or breasts is something extremely erotic. If we saw continually lose almost all interest in them and, I dare predict, we would be a lot less but 7.000 million.

I also encourage you to predict something else: if for some reason we humans could think slowing population growth would be expected that nudity became fashionable.

Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): La vestimenta y la conservación de la especie.

(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.157)

●●●