Although we are used to think and say that the
places with the highest environmental values are very suitable for the
majority of living beings, not excluding our species, in fact the opposite
could happen.
The focus of this article
refers to the classic case of inequality between rich and poor, but approached
from another angle, ie, trying to see what relationship exists between the poor
territories and population, and, therefore, what relationship between rich
territory and population.
We observed both in plants and
animals: some habitats are, for biological development, more conducive than
others.
It is likely that humans can
live anywhere on earth where there is sufficient oxygen, but the results can be
very different.
All would think that the
richest territories in human development is very low, while in the poorest
areas, human development is better.
As life in the tropics seems
to burst in quantity and variety, it may be true that humans lose vitality and
creativity in places too benign.
Although we are used to think
and say that the places with the highest environmental values are very
suitable for the majority of living beings, not excluding our species, in fact
the opposite could happen.
I dare to say that they should
take care disparities related to wealth or poverty of the territories they
inhabit every people, because socio- economic inequalities between people are
greater in rich territories.
In this study correspond, case
by case, territory by territory, which should make humans very rich territories
established to counteract the damage this will cause. On the contrary, should
not deal in the territories do aridity ideal because there are people who
achieve established resolve carried away by the animal instinct we have and that
appears when we face challenges of survival.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.145)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario