The ablest citizens optimize their performance if they know that they can accumulate wealth will be enjoyed by your heirs.
In a series of articles recently published (1), I told them that the human being does not develop properly, or destitute, or in the lush richness.
In the same theoretical line of those items, which include the right to leave the accumulated wealth to descendants (heirs) has people in favor and others opposed.
Opponents argue that no one should have won what is not through their efforts and those in favor say that the person who manages to amass a fortune has the added attraction that the result of their efforts will be enjoyed by your loved ones (heirs), rather than go into the coffers of the State or the Church.
Therefore, inheritance often hinder the personal development of all are heirs because without their efforts, as in countries rich soil and subsoil, in which new generations inherit territorial riches hardly encourage them to work with hard.
By contrast, the most capable citizens optimize their performance if they know that they can accumulate wealth will be enjoyed by your loved ones. If the most successful entrepreneurs and knew that his fortune will go to the state or any church, may not feel encouraged to give their best.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): Los herederos perjudicados.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.176)