The coexistence of natives indolent industrious immigrants
may be conflicting by different attitude towards life who knows the challenges
and who does not know them.
We know that the territories can be very
different despite being relatively close. For example, a fertile land can be
next to a mountain 100 % unproductive.
Now imagine that the mountainous area and the
grassland area, belong to different peoples. Coincidentally, the border that
separates leaves from one side to another infertile mountain side land suitable
for any crop.
It is clear that both peoples have very
different life conditions. We might anticipate that the people living on the
mountain will have to be more resourceful, hardworking, disciplined, thrifty,
caring and modernized than the other, you live where livelihoods can depend on
out to collect fruit every time you feel hungry.
However, if these people belonged to the same
country, if both geographical areas they were not separated by a border, the
situation would be different. Perhaps the mountain would be uninhabited and all
would gather in the fertile lands to enjoy the benefits of the land.
This set of people moved from the mountain to
the valley, and not have to work as hard or be smart or disciplined, or
thrifty, not caring, not tech.
There would be another important change: like
all human beings are different in many features, but mainly in our feelings,
desires and intentions, we are certain that the inhabitants of the valley would
have all the same assets: foreign (ex-Highlanders) have more wealth the
natives, they would feel uncomfortable with foreign-rich and that would lead to
social conflict between poor (native) and rich (immigrants).
In the first situation, when people belonging
to different jurisdictions, we had no social conflict because, in any case,
would trade both peoples, have diplomatic relations, but there were no
conflicts of envy. Farmers should probably import many goods from the most
sophisticated mountain and this, to some extent, balance the quality of life of
both peoples.
As we see, belong to the same people, the same
family integration, creates conflicts, whereas the separation increases the
chances of better relations within each village, good trade relations between
the two groups, and a decrease in conflicts caused by inequalities in the
distribution of wealth.
According to this hypothesis, the most fertile
area would be exposed to less fertile area social problems. Jealousy, envy, the
more time and energy available that allow a territory that is not present great
challenges, are contributing factors alone, explosives discomforts.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.148)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario