Half the world's
population enjoys learning that the other half is worse, who suffers, who is
poorer.
Cursa February 2014 and, since last month, the press devotes a large
space of his news to tell the 85 richest people in the world have the same
heritage that has the poorest half of the world population.
The data, from my point of view, directly stimulates envy, own the
psyche of every human being and also glad selfish hearts of the other half of
the world population.
The aim of this article is to reflect on how they handle the media
economic inequalities that exist within our species.
Although unfailingly these persistent reports abound in allusions to
concepts such as "distributive injustice", "inexcusable
greed", "sinful selfishness", "aberrant obscenity”
journalistic phenomenon may have a deeper reason, besides the aforementioned
convict economic inequality.
First, I do not think I media companies are interested in eradicating
distributive inequality because if this happened, they would have less to
report.
If we went out in the world for a moment and we were guided by that
information, we could say that half of the world population suffers and the
other half look at how the first suffers.
From the stratosphere, we might think that the only financially able to
buy information are members of that half of humanity that is not the poorest.
Therefore, everything that is said the poorest will not become known to them,
they are so poor they can not afford to learn even when they are mentioned.
It is likely that the size of media companies is adequate to preserve
its economic and financial health news by selling only half of the world
population. These companies have the other half of the population is not a client.
To keep customers buying have to be happy with the news. The only news
we buy are nice, you provide us with some kind of pleasure. We do not buy news
that cause us ulcer, insomnia, diarrhea. This is and should be accepted as an
axiomatic truth.
If half of humanity buying the news that the other half is starving is
because some sort of pleasure to receive such information. For example, you can
enjoy thinking, "I'm not as bad as the others”; “I have to be careful not
to become poor"; "reaffirm that the rulers are all useless because
they can not get out of poverty by half population”, 'If you do not Complete
the group of the 85 's because I would be embarrassed to be so rich”, “Those
who are poorer than me 'something be done' to receive that punishment" ;
"What fun is to see how they fight the rich and poor! The middle class are
the best".
In sum: News of
distributive injustice pleased to half of humanity (three thousand five hundred
million people).
Note: Original
in Spanish (without translation by Google): La
mitad pobre alegra a la mitad menos pobre.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.121)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario