Vampirism is an apt
metaphor for what the readers who prefer books with extensive bibliography.
It seems that the writers of books that provide a lot of
literature are just reviewers, summaries builders, people who make a short
story of several works.
Film critics, who have watched many movies are reviewers,
able to tell something you saw and add some appeal Anecdotally people. The
truth is that no critic (Reviewer) is capable of shooting film sixty seconds of
something he could recommend.
The same goes for food writers, different restaurants are
walking and then write about what they found food, variety, customer service
and the ambience of the place, the price level and the hygiene of the toilets.
Writers of books with extensive bibliography are
misunderstood by the readers are not good writers, as well as the others
mentioned are not great filmmakers or great chefs.
Sure, to some extent it is logical: when readers assess the
quality of a writer by the amount of books that says you have read, dream of
the belief that will make a great saving of time and money eating this
condensate to avoid buying and reading all the books I read writer.
This mentality is a kind of vampirism: reasoning with the
reader tries to take this logic, suck, devour, digest wisdom and writer.
Vampirism is contagious because vampires became such because
they were vampirism. Are likely to abound in literature writers actually make a
list of all authors who have blood sucked by reading them.
Continuing the metaphor of vampirism, note that not all
victims of vampires have good digestion, ie, not all bloods are edible, ie, the
reviewers of many books not always well understood what they read.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.145)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario